^^ All good points, CoffinCakes, though I would refine your baseline LD definition of LD'ing being "any dream in which you realize you are dreaming" to something like "any dream in which you know you are dreaming." The difference might seem subtle, yet I think it is significant, mostly because it separates things like dreaming you are lucid from actually being aware that you are in a dream. I'm not arguing the point, though, because I've been there before on these forums, and I have no interest in going there again... However, another part of your post did raise my eyebrows:
 Originally Posted by CoffinCakes
So no, to me, it doesn't make sense to say I dreamed that I knew I was dreaming, but I really didn't. I could say that about any lucid dream ever, no matter how eye-popping it was, but that doesn't make it seem any more or less likely.
Yes, you can indeed say that about any LD ever, can't you? Funny that nobody ever talks about this on the forums:
Dreaming, which certainly includes lucid dreaming, is the one and only thing we humans do that is defined exclusively by memory.
...and memory is a tool that any trial lawyer will tell you is a remarkably fallible and malleable tool; especially when combined with our desire to have LD's or interesting or meaningful dreams. Unlike anything else we do in life, there is no existent external vehicle for recording our dreams as they happen. We cannot monitor them with a video recorder, write them down as they are happening, tell someone about them, snap a photo of our dreamscapes or favorite DC's, or any of the other things we normally and easily do to store our waking-life moments in places far more reliable than memory. Memory is all we have.
Yes, LaBerge et al certainly proved that LD's exist, but he did so with experiments that involved simple physical signals (like eye movement) and did nothing to record what the subjects saw as they moved their eyes. And yes, EEG's and certainly can indicate when dreams are happening, and fMRI's can apparently hint that our waking-life consciousness is present in dreams... but still no actual dreams. Finally, I did see some pictures a scientist took of a subject's dreams, but those pictures were decidedly unrelated to the dream the subject reported.
So: In a sense, dreams exist only in our past, and our only reference to them is memory. With that in mind, I think it is important to learn to work with your memory to be sure that what you just had was actually a LD, and that you didn't just dream that you were lucid. This is not as hard as it sounds, and in the end will allow you to both better remember your dreams, and better prepare yourself for actually being lucid in your dreams, rather than getting caught in a trap of consistently dreaming you are lucid without ever reaching the point where you truly know you are dreaming during the dream. I personally have been practicing this for years, and have learned to recognize upon waking that what I just had was not a true LD, and then doing a DEILD to make it so; all it takes is a willingness to believe that maybe I was just dreaming about being lucid, and then avoid adding stuff to the memory to retroactively "make" that dream a lucid.
Finally, being able to differentiate between FLD's and the real thing only improves the LD'ing experience, because it helps keep FLD's from becoming the norm and trapping you in a series of recurring NLD's that just seem lucid... and once you can clear that trap easily, the fun and growth really begins! Your "official" LD count may decrease a bit as you learn to dismiss FLD's, but I believe that the content of that count will become much richer and decidedly more memorable.
Oh, and yes, the OP is an excellent example of a person who is using their memory well and with honesty, by recognizing immediately after them that those first "lucids" were just dreams in order to finally "wake up" for real.
|
|
Bookmarks