 Originally Posted by Phydeaux_3
I would probably define a "natural" as someone who needs very little effort or intention to obtain lucidity, it just happens for them spontaneously. Not like for the rest of us chumps who have to work our nads off to achieve even the most remote success. Of course it's very subjective, every different individual has a different struggle, some really hard (like mine) & others seem to get it a lot easier. So I guess the term natural can have a varied meaning, but basically it boils down to "easier than for the rest of us". IMHO.
I only disagree with you because he said "natural lucid dreamer" which if you dissect the phrase, means someone who naturally has lucid dreams. So if you were saying that someone who has frequent lucid dreams, or that they come easy, I would say a "naturally proficient lucid dreamer" or something like that. Just saying someone is a natural lucid dreamer, doesn't indicate whether it comes easy to them or not, but that it naturally occurred.
Also, I don't think that it boils down to "Easier than the rest of us." I am sure there are people here who are not naturals, but have better recall, better control, and more lucids than some naturals. I know my recall is pretty bad, and I rarely have lucids when I try, and my control isn't too good either.
But I had a lucid dream when I was in 3rd grade, so I consider myself a natural since it just happened randomly without know of it or trying.
I wish we could all agree on a single meaning, because I get confused when people mention naturals, as in one of your threads Phydeaux_3. I thought you meant someone who had a lucid dream without knowing about them, not someone proficient at them. But I hope this post lets you know why I misinterpreted that. But in my opinion, the words "natural lucid dreamer" are different than someone who is naturally proficient at lucid dreaming. The words are close, but I don't think they have the same meaning.
|
|
Bookmarks