Yet somehow, you seem to be biased about whether the "very inexpensive and easy" method is going to be reliable. I should be giving you the impression that, in most successful cases, it quite likely is. |
|
|
|
Yet somehow, you seem to be biased about whether the "very inexpensive and easy" method is going to be reliable. I should be giving you the impression that, in most successful cases, it quite likely is. |
|
Last edited by really; 08-04-2010 at 04:18 AM.
The Ultimate Lucid Mp3 Thread Link
Mp3 track available here (02/2015): http://www27.zippyshare.com/v/36261038/file.html
Here is the study: |
|
|
|
<3 Tim... I made a thread on him a while back. I love the 'Storm' one. |
|
It is quite simple and I don't know what you have a problem with. |
|
The Ultimate Lucid Mp3 Thread Link
Mp3 track available here (02/2015): http://www27.zippyshare.com/v/36261038/file.html
You haven't posted any evidence for chrissakes. What evidence? Just some kind of record of an instance in which two people clearly shared a piece of information. |
|
Both sharing information and collecting information, which is fine for me. It is all about the experience. |
|
Last edited by really; 08-07-2010 at 11:20 AM.
The Ultimate Lucid Mp3 Thread Link
Mp3 track available here (02/2015): http://www27.zippyshare.com/v/36261038/file.html
Okay, nothing. |
|
I'm sorry, but I don't see any way to obtain objective evidence pertaining shared dreaming. It just seems this one will have to remain outside of science for now. In the meantime, could we please refrain from pretending to know for fact whether or not shared dreaming is possible? |
|
There's no way you could have said any of that if you'd actually read the posts. |
|
Even more bulletproof would be to have one person carry out a highly specific action, such as drawing a giant smiley face in the sky using fireballs or rearranging the stars, since some people have trouble recalling specific dream dialogue. It'd be kind of hard to miss something big like that. |
|
I know it's old thread, but I heard that DreamHackers from Russia managed to share their dreams. I think that They were much more better in LD than anybody here, because they WOULD BE ABLE TO CURE PEOPLE IN REAL LIFE BY ENTERING TO LABYRINTS. They also said that there are so entities in more specific LD world were they CAN HURT YOU IN PCHISICALL WORLD WITH DISEASES. |
|
Hmm it seems there is alot of conversation here. |
|
Our truest life is when we are in dreams awake
I dont think its very realistic that the deeper u go the slower time goes... Because actually it wouls mean that if you go so deep yo dawg cant form a proper sententace, ur brain would need to imagine so fast it would liek maik magnetigal field and overheat |
|
1. No. Shared dreaming is a load of shit, and Inception was even more illogical than that concept alone. |
|
Not sure about shared dreaming as shown in the movie (peeople showing up in each other's dreams as whole avatars), but another possibility is telepathy between two dreamers, of which there has been some evidence of. If anyone was ever on Lucidity.com, there was an article posted about how a test subject viewed a Christian-themed picture (IIRC it was Jesus feeding the crowds, with boats in the background, etc), and somehow made a connection with a sleeping person, who's dream journal the next day had dreams involving boats, fishing, Christianity, etc. While the picture in it's original form did not appear in the dreams, concepts of it did. Maybe that is a possibility of shared dreaming? Where dreamers share details of each other's dreams telepathically? |
|
"You mustn't be afraid to dream a little bigger, darling" - Eames, Inception
Lucid Dreaming To-Do List -
[] - Join the Brotherhood of Steel [] - Go to Pandora and become One of The People [] - Defeat the Combine [] - Build an empire [] - Travel at - and faster - than the speed of light
[] - 360 degree vision [] - Fly the SR-71 (and many more aircraft)
Bookmarks