When I started as a young child I observed man's inability to do right. I said to myself, perhaps reality is too hard, can dreams be used to practice in. I set myself a goal, to simply tell my mother in a dream that I was in fact dreaming.
I entered state on the third try. I found myself in our kitchen and my mother was doing the dishes, back to me. I looked around and started to leave. My mother turned and asked, "What do you want, Jay?" I remembered. I spread my hands and said, all of this is a dream.
From then on I learned to role play in my dreams, to experiement.
I often rebelled, I know that dreams of fear are a question to the dreamer--how important is knowing to you? Learn to calm your mind, and see.
As far as my intelligence go, I did not ask you to believe it. I could give a rats ass if you do or not. If you would like a copy of some of my work, it has been on the net for years. Just recently, I let my sites go, for lack of interest. I use to make audiobooks, ebooks, etc and give them away free. No ad's, no thank you, simply free. The Underground Grammarian was one series, Mitchell was a very bright and funny guy. Dialogs of Plato anothe series. Math books, were original source documents, sometimes I would critique the work with just a few equations showing how horrible the work was. The author did not know how to write up a geometric figure into equations. Fact is, Cartesian geometry originated the same way. It is useful, but in a limited sense.
It took me years to figure out what the meaning of a test in dreamstate was about, years before I understood the Trinity. All I know, is it is one of very few times I was spoken to in English. At the end of the test, all I got was All right. You win.
The first part of the test was about perception, the second conception, the third will.
At that time I was completely stumped as to what it was about.
Your mind is not different from itself. One part of it does not teach the other part. And so, to start, questioning your own sanity is not a bad idea, however, when facts get involved, real facts, these are things you cannot even imagine.
And you should not believe me about anything. That is not what it is about, learning by rote. Do it for yourself, between you and your teacher--and learn by experience--belief in words that you have no experience in, is exactly what judgment is not about.
I will give you a hint about Christ. It was not about the miricles, It was about the Word becoming flesh. Word does not mean something different than word. If you learn to say what you see in his miricles, you will find the same metaphors in the OT. You had to say what you saw. Only someone who had understanding would have known what it was about. Those who always claim to talk in God's stead, did not even know the first thing about how one is taught. The same method that is used to teach in what you call the lucid dreamstate. Language begins with perception, saying what you see. As simple as that. Men are doing that--the sick are being healed, the dead raised.
Now, if you still wish to believe me, when you know the truth is there to be found, you are a fool.
Let me give you another hint. For over a couple thousand years, man has asked why there are two accounts of creation, a blessing and a curse. Watch as the curse is turned into a blessing.
The Serpent spoke in the name of the Lord.
What he said came to pass.
God confirmed his words. (By Law, these three make the Serpent a prophet)
Man's life was increased.
Man became like God, knowing judgment.
How is it, if Gen 3 was about the fall of man, did he become like God after the fall. Duh.
What better way to test human judgment than by pitting the Biggest against the smallest.. Hello world, you failed. Don't worry, though, it was known that you were going to fail. Its a wake up call.
|
|
Bookmarks