I'm going to come off sounding like an arrogant jerk,
but anyhow
Ordinary people (stupid people) should not get involved in technical discussions
How many people can honestly say "I know what net neutrality is. I also know the pros and cons of a totally neutral network vs. the pros and cons of a QoS network" ?
A totally neutral network would be shit
I don't want my VoIP call to be dropped because the guy down the road is eating all the bandwidth by streaming an HD film
Likewise, a network based on overly draconian QoS would also be shit
I have paid for my bandwidth, I want to use this an any way I see fit, as long as I'm not degrading the service for others
There's a balance that needs to be struck
It annoys the hell out of me when ignorant people get all pissy over some deeply technical issue they have no understanding of
If I was in charge of an ISP
I would have 4 tiers of service
Tier 1 - Realtime
Communications that happen in realtime need top priority
Spikes in latency must be avoided at all costs
Worst case scenario, drop some packets
Packet lose is not a big issue, but latency must be kept low
Examples:
- VoIP
- Location awareness (GPS, etc.)
Tier 2 - Streaming
Communications that happen in semi-realtime (Ie. streaming content)
Packet lose must be prevented, however latency must be kept within reasonable limits
Examples:
- Online streaming video / audio (Netflix, youtube, etc.)
Tier 3 - General use
General use cases
The bulk of internet traffic would fall into this category
Packet lose must be avoided at all costs, but latency is not a big issue
Tier 4 - Bulk, Non-interactive
Bandwidth heavy comms that happen in the background without user interaction
Examples:
- p2p file transfers
|
|
Bookmarks