Thread: Metaphysical Paradoxes

The realities behind the same word are actually unique and different.

This video explains it well Abstract Objects Vs. Arrangements - YouTube

Originally Posted by Wayfaerer

The realities behind the same word are actually unique and different.

This video explains it well Abstract Objects Vs. Arrangements - YouTube

The realities are different in some ways, but they are enough the same to be forms of the same general type of thing.

Originally Posted by Universal Mind

The realities are different in some ways, but they are enough the same to be forms of the same general type of thing.

Who decides this?

Originally Posted by PhilosopherStoned

Who decides this?

Nobody. There are two of these even if we don't say there are two of them. We might define what qualifies as one of those, but they are still there even when we are not analyzing them. How many of them are in this post? Serious question. How many of them are in this post?

Did you see the video I posted? I really think you should watch it.

Sesame Street - Baker #2 - YouTube

I'm still waiting for you to show me i of something.

Originally Posted by Universal Mind

I'm still waiting for you to show me i of something.

We're not talking about complex numbers, we're talking about your complete ineptitude in debate and your ability to completely ignore the point of a question.

However, if ** is two of *,

then

*
*

is i of

**.

At any rate, I'm done talking to you. Please fuck off and don't ever get your job back as a math teacher.

Originally Posted by PhilosopherStoned

We're not talking about complex numbers, we're talking about your complete ineptitude in debate and your ability to completely ignore the point of a question.

Could you be a little more vague, Dr. Ad Hominem? I think it's interesting that you throw out such a bizarre accusation when I have been so detailed in my on-point responses and you have been just acting like a two year old (Yes, there is such a thing.) having a temper tantrum instead of countering my points. It is you who said this...

Originally Posted by PhilosopherStoned

I already told you that I'm not going to define two.

That's how much of a participant you have been in this debate.

Originally Posted by PhilosopherStoned

However, if ** is two of *,

then

*
*

is i of

**.

There are square root of -1 ** when you post them vertically? That is such ridiculous symbolism. You might as well say there are of * when you post them like this *...**. It's just made up bullshit. Did you understand the Sesame Street video? I can explain it to you if you want me to.

Originally Posted by PhilosopherStoned

At any rate, I'm done talking to you. Please fuck off and don't ever get your job back as a math teacher.

My, how frustrated and personality disturbed you really are. Stop acting like an i year old!