Thread: There is a commonly held propensity within the scientific ..

Deleted

Just to make sure that everyone else is aware of what you're lying about:

You can not walk onto a jobsite where your company is not the primary contractor and do ANYTHING.

You can't walk onto my jobsite and do ANYTHING unless I'm the sub. And I don't sub.

So again, one final time: YOU ARE NOBODY

Deleted

Deleted

*yawn*

5days and $754 and any other monkey can get one too.

I agree!

Deleted

Which then has to be served upon the council of record.

One final thought before I walk away from this one; Anyone that tries to arrest me without a badge and a gun will wake up in the 40yd dumpster after having met Mr. Hitachi Reciprocating Saw

Deleted

Deleted

not so tough after meeting Mr. Hitachi Reciprocating Saw. I can understand that you have no idea what one is. So let me explain: 2180 beats/min, bimetal blade. Cuts *anything*. Cut a bulldozer in half if you have the time. Take about 5 mins to reduce a "grown man" into 18" chunks handy for tossing in the dumpster.

BTW: The number of times I've been cited in the last two years? Zero. Number of times my work hasn't passed inspection? Once. Length to correct? less than 30 seconds. Passed inspection on the same trip.

So maybe everyone that works for your company is as incompetant as you?

Anyway - I'm done with this. Point made long time ago.

*sigh*... look how much work you guys just gave me. I have to read through 5 pages of stuff and figure out whether to be worried about the 'nasty' and off topic bits.
Unfortunately I don't have internet at home for the next few weeks, hence the 5 pages

Please try to be nice...

Sorry!

Sorry 'bout that. I can give you the summary version if you need.

Originally posted by Awaken4e1
These ‘quarks’ are notably found in clusters, of three called Baryons, or of two (a sub-group) called hadrons

No, that's not right. Hadrons are any composite particles made up of quarks. Baryons and mesons are classes of hadrons.

After that you seem to say, "asymptotic freedom exists and it's weird so it must've been made by something really really intelligent because only something that intelligent could comprehend such weirdness." Well, last year's Nobel was awarded just for the discovery of asymptotic freedom. Give us a break, huh?

Originally posted by Ex Nine


No, that's not right. Hadrons are any composite particles made up of quarks. Baryons and mesons are classes of hadrons.

After that you seem to say, \"asymptotic freedom exists and it's weird so it must've been made by something really really intelligent because only something that intelligent could comprehend such weirdness.\" Well, last year's Nobel was awarded just for the discovery of asymptotic freedom. Give us a break, huh?

he discovery of asymptotic freedom

(a beautiful unpredictable dance of energy.) [/b]

Yes, seeing it is not understanding it...

I may see God but I would not be able to explain it (to you)

Originally posted by Ex Nine


No, that's not right. Hadrons are any composite particles made up of quarks. Baryons and mesons are classes of hadrons.

After that you seem to say, \"asymptotic freedom exists and it's weird so it must've been made by something really really intelligent because only something that intelligent could comprehend such weirdness.\" Well, last year's Nobel was awarded just for the discovery of asymptotic freedom. Give us a break, huh?

he discovery of asymptotic freedom quote](a beautiful unpredictable dance of energy.)

quarks and their (sub-groups), *(sub-groups are still a part of the whole quark(s) [/b]

Don't undrstand your point I thought it was plainly stated?
[/b]

I think it's a miracle I found something answerable in those two posts.

I'm reminded of a dictum for science journal editors. A wrong theory explained clearly is better than an accurate theory explained poorly.

It doesn't seem like God thought of that one.

Originally posted by kimpossible
Sorry 'bout that. *I can give you the summary version if you need.

Do you always feel the need to take over someone else’s post? You must be very insecure.

dreamtamer, I'm still waiting for you to prove that you can't prove a negative.

Perhaps it finally caught up with you that that would be proving a negative?

Originally posted by dreamtamer007

Do you always feel the need to take over someone else’s post? You must be very insecure.

Try taking a clue from all the posts deleted by awaken, eh?

Originally posted by Ex Nine
dreamtamer, I'm still waiting for you to prove that you can't prove a negative.

Perhaps it finally caught up with you that that would be proving a negative?

You know, I think you all are on an ego trip and trying to make yourselves look smart and other stupid. I'll answer your stupid gesture with this then your on your own. I’ve said before, back when you guys were in diapers I was sitting with friends that worked for RCA aerospace playing chess over a pizza or sandwich. I think it is common knowledge among aerospace engineers (prove a negative) long before you were born. Whether you want to believe it or not, the people I had as close friends are responsible for putting the first satellites in space. I think there perception of an absolute statement was more stable then yours. Why don't you try to learn from your mistakes and move on?

Wow, you got ad hominem right away. And the silliest argument from authority I've ever seen. Maybe your friends were messing with you...? You don't appear to understand the concept of "fallacy," and, therefore, all of logic. They took advantage of you brother.

You were trying to get me to believe you were a cartoon character, who occasionally assumed the identity of Disney's Mickey Mouse™.

Well, I'm sorry to say, you're right. You are Mickey Mouse.

Originally posted by American Heritage Dictionary
Mickey Mouse
adj. Slang
...
2. Intellectually unchallenging; simple:

But you're still not a cartoon character.

This thread should be renamed "Prove you're better than me by spewing out random facts and statements about your intellectual history."

Rev, I think you should stop putting a bunch of words with positive and negative connotations in a hat, drawing them out randomly, and stringing them together into sentences. The majority of your posts make little sense, or say absurd things with as many words as possible. Then when you respond to posts you pull out stupid and senseless one-liners that don't mean anything. It's no wonder KimPossible decided to try to prove that she's the boss of you, your response to reason is so infuriatingly sensless and yet unyielding.

In your next post, rev, I want you to write like you're writing to a third grader, then we might more easily pin those ideas down, and maybe have a substantive debate, or discover that you don't have any definite ideas. Either way, I think it will improve the condition of this board.