There is a commonly held propensity within the scientific ..

**dreamtamer007** · 10-18-2005 04:27 AM

Originally posted by Belisarius
This thread should be renamed \"Prove you're better than me by spewing out random facts and statements about your intellectual history.\"

Rev, I think you should stop putting a bunch of words with positive and negative connotations in a hat, drawing them out randomly, and stringing them together into sentences. The majority of your posts make little sense, or say absurd things with as many words as possible. Then when you respond to posts you pull out stupid and senseless one-liners that don't mean anything. It's no wonder KimPossible decided to try to prove that she's the boss of you, your response to reason is so infuriatingly sensless and yet unyielding.

In your next post, rev, I want you to write like you're writing to a third grader, then we might more easily pin those ideas down, and maybe have a substantive debate, or discover that you don't have any definite ideas. Either way, I think it will improve the condition of this board.

Bull crap, I just thought I'd join in and toot like yout You just prove my point Lol

**Awaken4e1** · 10-18-2005 07:26 AM

I think it might be that my mind works differently than most it is not an internal thing for me to carry on like a ticker tape I just think in flowing waves, and not in sporadic ideas.

I know that my sentence structure is way to long and connected, it is just the way I express myself because my mind works very fast and if I don’t type fast I begin to get ahead of myself, and loose a lot of the people I’m trying to relate too.

It is a manner of my mental conditioning which combines multiple conceptions into one seeming never ending flow of output. Maybe this will help you understand from where I’m coming from.

The Rev.

**Awaken4e1** · 10-18-2005 07:48 AM

I would like to take this time to apologize to all who where involved this exercise of vanity. It is not my intent to carry on in such a manner as this.

Please find it in your hearts to ‘forgive me’ I repent of this conversation.

P.S. I have nothing to prove to anyone by my God

The Rev.

**Rakkantekimusouka** · 10-18-2005 09:00 AM

For TSOAL's sake, don't keep double-posting! If you reply, then want to reply to someone else, do what everyone else around here does and edit your original post.

As for my thoughts on this, I have officially decided that I don't care anymore. You have your opinons and I have mine; you have your knowledge and I have mine. Live and let live, and let the Almighty Brady pwn you as he sees fit.

(Oh, and spooner too.)

**kimpossible** · 10-18-2005 09:24 AM

Belisarius:

Good point. The odds that a theory will stand up and eventually become a model or a law can pretty accurately be graded by explaining it to a 5yo. If they call BS on it - they're likely right.

**Placebo** · 10-18-2005 10:59 AM

Originally posted by kimpossible
Belisarius:

Good point. The odds that a theory will stand up and eventually become a model or a law can pretty accurately be graded by explaining it to a 5yo. If they call BS on it - they're likely right.

Have you tried explaining quantum physics to a 5yo recently? I think schroedinger will be lost on them...

**kimpossible** · 10-18-2005 06:11 PM

Actually, yes. To an entire room's worth. Their questions were insightful.

**Awaken4e1** · 10-19-2005 07:00 AM

Contrary to the entire off course replies, mostly to insult some one’s intellect or lack thereof. There is an irrefutable constancy of denial by those who trust in science over intuition. This is the very thing which dims their ability of insight into the unseen.

Also I would ask those who live by logic, please explain the origin of energy. And, to prove its existence.

**kimpossible** · 10-19-2005 07:06 AM

>> There is an irrefutable constancy of denial by those who trust in science over intuition.

There is an irrefutable constancy of denil by those who trust in intuition over science.

8.85418782 × 10^-12 m^-3 kg^-1 s^4 A^2

**Placebo** · 10-20-2005 11:59 AM

Am I gonna have to break you two up? All I ever see between you two is barely-shielded insults. If you have a problem, please discuss it in PMs, I beg you.

Originally posted by kimpossible
Actually, yes. To an entire room's worth. Their questions were insightful.

You're saying that 5 year olds are perfectly fine with quantum physics, but 27 year olds do ?

**Awaken4e1** · 10-21-2005 04:30 AM

Good advice!

Thread: There is a commonly held propensity within the scientific ..

LinkBack

Thread Tools

Display

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions