I'd like to elaborate further on this ...
Basically, the idea behind seeing Biblical passages through a Jungian lens is that it reveals more sense beyond what is literally implied. Behind its romantic parables is an implicit psychological process full of archetypal observations and an accurate account of reality itself from the human perspective. The reality seems dreadful but the indication here is that human life is a perpetual struggle where the possibility for improvement and potential betterment should always be remembered. It's a noble pursuit, because, in spite of the hurdles and the chaos, one perseveres with strength and the faith to endure; otherwise, what do we have if not the search for truth, meaning and purpose?
Suddenly, the Biblical concept of free will becomes clear as we can choose between two modes of being: Abel or Cain (two opposite ends of an existential spectrum). Of course free will is absurd when we take into account that we live in a cause-and-effect universe and determinism is more objectively evident. But the anthropic lens gives us the illusion of freedom to choose, and the illusion is true enough. We can either embrace the whole pursuit towards self-integration and virtue by taking responsibility and enacting the hero archetype (follow Christ) OR we can be bitter and blame the whole world for having to struggle through tragedy and damn it all to hell.
In the Bible, Jesus Christ is both redeemer and judge—representing both the left and right hands of God, which symbolise mercy and judgement. The mercy is the compassion necessary to create a balance whereby people can pick themselves up having previously taken a fall. In a state of depression, individuals need encouragement and reminders to believe in themselves because everyone has potential; so when someone is down, suspend judgement lest they are overwhelmed and have mercy instead. When they are up, they can continue with divine inspiration as they follow God, who, by His very holy nature, can't help but judge all things.
The crucifixion of Jesus is a merciful narrative where the Messiah shows us the way to redemption which often involves carrying the burden of life, taking responsibility and willing to make sacrifices. In the Book of Revelation, he returns as all judge and everybody fails by his standards as the approaching apocalypse conveys the finality of all things and the inevitable loss of everything including one's life which the majority is not prepared for. By that time, there is no mercy, only judgement. Psychologically, it appears to relate the senior outlook of someone who, having experienced and committed enough errors in life, begins to have a cantankerous attitude whereby everyone and everything is judged including oneself. Nothing is ever good enough in this irascible viewpoint where it becomes clear that nobody is anywhere near the ideal that was unobtainable to begin with (at least within one's lifetime), and we can only hope that the next generations learn from our mistakes and strive to get closer to the grace of God. The Nicene Creed, which informs liturgy in much of mainstream Christianity, includes the following statements about Christ:
'...he ascended into heaven and is seated at the right hand of the Father. He will come again in his glory to judge the living and the dead, and his kingdom will have no end. ... We look for the resurrection of the dead, and the life of the world to come.'
|
|
Bookmarks