Thread: What makes morality moral?

Originally Posted by psychology student

Ah, you missed the point. (both of you)

But there was THREE of us!

Originally Posted by Omicron

But there was THREE of us!

Dropout never did get to a proper mafs class.

Originally Posted by Omicron

But there was THREE of us!

Was that a some sort of attempt at humour?

Originally Posted by psychology student

Was that a some sort of attempt at humour?

Is this more dodging the questions at hand?

^ Was that a rhetorical question?

Are you Omicron?

Originally Posted by psychology student

Was that a some sort of attempt at humour?

It just seemed you were speaking to 3 people and addressed them as "both of you".


You forgot dear old Sandform.

I was reffering to the comments made by you and then that dinosaur toddler ?

Originally Posted by psychology student

Are you Omicron?

Uh, no. Where would you have gotten that from???

Originally Posted by psychology student

I was reffering to the comments made by you and then that dinosaur toddler ?

Aha. My mistake. It could've applied to Sandform as well so I got confused.


Anyway enough. Can you explain more fully why you can't answer the question?

Originally Posted by psychology student

I was reffering to the comments made by you and then that dinosaur toddler ?

Does ignoring the Original Poster, the original post, the original question, the new questions, and the dodging them while insulting my age make you feel like a big, bad, manly man over there?

I don't need to because not all theists go by that argument. I am not obliged to answer for those who do.

Originally Posted by Seismosaur

Does ignoring the Original Poster, the original post, the original question, the new questions, and the dodging them while insulting my age make you feel like a big, bad, manly man over there?

I missed one question, but addressed other concerns in Sandform's initial post. Although I don't require validation from a Internet forum to feel like a manly man. And I didn't insult your age, toddler has a secondary dialectical value where I live, although you wouldn't know that, so forgive me.

You're seriously telling me that you are refusing to answer a perfectly reasonable question.


And your refusing to tell us why you're refusing to answer the perfectly reasonable question.


Well.

Then why are you still here and why do you refuse to answer those questions, yet not explain why???

Originally Posted by psychology student

I missed one question, but addressed other concerns in Sandform's initial post. Although I don't require validation from a Internet forum to feel like a manly man. And I didn't insult your age, toddler has a secondary dialectical value where I live, although you wouldn't know that, so forgive me.

Psychology student, why is what God decides is moral automatically what is moral? Can you answer that?

I don't go by the argument that God should exist because the universe is so complex. If I don't advocate that particular belief, why should I answer the question?

Originally Posted by Universal Mind

Psychology student, why is what God decides is moral automatically what is moral? Can you answer that?

No, but I'm sure God can. Why don't you ask him.

Originally Posted by psychology student

I don't go by the argument that God should exist because the universe is so complex. If I don't advocate that particular belief, why should I answer the question?

When was that a part of the question??!!

You are a fucking moron, I swear. I am at the end of my patience.

The original question was what UM asked!!

Watch your language boy, you don't want to end up banned.

Originally Posted by Omicron

You're seriously telling me that you are refusing to answer a perfectly reasonable question.


And your refusing to tell us why you're refusing to answer the perfectly reasonable question.


Well.

Acknowledge this please PS.

At this point I might as well just accept that you will never answer the question because you cannot think like that because you have been brainwashed into submission from creative thought.

Oh well, it's not like we expect much from you anyways, dropout.

What was the question again?

Originally Posted by psychology student

No, but I'm sure God can. Why don't you ask him.

Why are you even in this thread? It is not like you are trying to analyze the topic.

This was the original question Psych:

Originally Posted by Sandform

Alright so what makes the deities version of morality moral? Is it because he was first? So what if there is no god, wouldn't humans be first? So essentially if there is no god then our morals are just as reasonable to exist as a theistic moral right?

Lets put this in contrast. Say there is no deity, then all that's left is humans. If we create consciousness of some sort in another thing of our own design, lets say technological consciousness, would that mean that anything we tell them as morality is what is moral?