WRONG. |
|
Abiogenesis is the theory that life can arise spontaneously from non-life molecules under proper conditions. Evidence for a large number of transitional forms to bridge the stages of this process is critical to prove the abiogenesis theory, especially during the early stages of the process. The view of how life originally developed from non-life to an organism capable of independent life and reproduction presented by the mass media is very similar to the following widely publicized account: |
|
WRONG. |
|
Last edited by A Roxxor; 07-21-2008 at 07:50 PM.
_________________________________________
We now return you to our regularly scheduled signature, already in progress.
_________________________________________
My Music
The Ear Is Always Correct - thoughts on music composition
What Sky Saw - a lucid dreaming journal
-Bluefinger v1.25- Enter the madness that are my dreams (DJ Update, non-LD)
"When you reject the scientific method in order to believe what you want, you know that you have failed at life. Sorry, but there is no justification, no matter how wordy you make it."
- Xei
DILD: 6, WILD: 1
I believe in Abiogenesis because it makes sense to me. Nobody claims that it has been proven true, but have at least looked at it from the point of view of whether it was possible. More exploration and experimentation is needed before anyone tries to claim it has been proven, but the way things are going, I feel confident it will be proven soon enough. |
|
_________________________________________
We now return you to our regularly scheduled signature, already in progress.
_________________________________________
My Music
The Ear Is Always Correct - thoughts on music composition
What Sky Saw - a lucid dreaming journal
Also Ne-Yo: Are you aware that Abiogenesis is comprised of several different hypotheses? |
|
Jesus God and the Holy Fuckin Ghost, Neyo has puzzled out the making of the world and universe and all the rest. We can all live in peace now. |
|
"This is how rain works. Evaporation gathers water particles in the clouds, Eventually there is too much water, and feminists make God cry."
:bravo:
There's no such thing as an 'evolutionist' you moron. |
|
See this is the problem I have with evolutionist why are you people always trying to pick apart important references to appear more feasible? Just state what’s real and stop trying to cut corners. |
|
I knew someone would throw it out. |
|
|
|
Hate to break it to you... but essentially, we are nothing but self-replicating chemicals. |
|
-Bluefinger v1.25- Enter the madness that are my dreams (DJ Update, non-LD)
"When you reject the scientific method in order to believe what you want, you know that you have failed at life. Sorry, but there is no justification, no matter how wordy you make it."
- Xei
DILD: 6, WILD: 1
-Bluefinger v1.25- Enter the madness that are my dreams (DJ Update, non-LD)
"When you reject the scientific method in order to believe what you want, you know that you have failed at life. Sorry, but there is no justification, no matter how wordy you make it."
- Xei
DILD: 6, WILD: 1
Probabilities don't count. |
|
Last edited by A Roxxor; 07-21-2008 at 09:18 PM.
Life doesn't exist. Hence, abiogenesis must be true. |
|
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N1eP84n-Lvw
Ich brauche keine Waffe.
Ich ermittle ausschließlich mit dem Gehirn!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N1eP84n-Lvw
Saying they weren't all inanimate and producing proof regarding which ones were are two different things, thus your statement is invalid unless you can show me which molecules were animate in creating life. |
|
No you fucking moron. |
|
You must address this point. "Life" is, like most words, an arbitrary concept with no objective meaning or relevance. Objective relevance is only found within the natural physicalist sciences chemistry and physics. The distinction between life and non-life is pragmatically useful, but arbitrary. |
|
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N1eP84n-Lvw
Ich brauche keine Waffe.
Ich ermittle ausschließlich mit dem Gehirn!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N1eP84n-Lvw
Pretty much my example with Uranium, but more blunt. |
|
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N1eP84n-Lvw
Ich brauche keine Waffe.
Ich ermittle ausschließlich mit dem Gehirn!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N1eP84n-Lvw
You crack me up, why can't you control your emotions? You know all that anger is going to lead to high-blood pressure unless you channel that negative energy into something positive. |
|
Actually, taking into consideration the wording of your statement, you implied that there is a distinction between living and non-living with regards to the source you were referring to, of which you inferred they were presenting whatever argument wrongly. I simply provided a counterpoint against your statement, at least, what you were insinuating. |
|
-Bluefinger v1.25- Enter the madness that are my dreams (DJ Update, non-LD)
"When you reject the scientific method in order to believe what you want, you know that you have failed at life. Sorry, but there is no justification, no matter how wordy you make it."
- Xei
DILD: 6, WILD: 1
|
|
the answer that seems to make the most sense, is the earth itself being viewed as an organism/conscious/alive/take your pick. that the primordial soup, was already alive before forming the first cellular based life |
|
I said Talk Origins doesn’t draw reference to inanimate molecules when discussing abiogenesis. |
|
Last edited by Ne-yo; 07-22-2008 at 12:14 AM.
Bookmarks