Thread: God - Omnipotent, Omnipresent, Omniscient

I'll respond to what little you have elaborated on. You'll still probably have to go over what you've said. UM, you don't have to respond to this thread if it bothers you. Don't come here if you're going to beat a dead horse.

Originally Posted by Universal Mind

That is a limit, and therefore out of the scope of the definition.

Not within Omnipotence. If nothing is outside the Absolute Reality, then there is no possibility for it to be limited; no way for it to be destroyed.

Originally Posted by Universal Mind

No matter what action you mention after those words, you give an attribute that does not apply to an omnipotent being. There is no "cannot" with an infinitely powerful being. It is a direct, blatant, obvious contradiction.

Neither does anything apply to "He can". Mind the linguistic limitation, if it is confusing. With the three main terms applied, God doesn't do anything and doesn't not do anything. It is also beyond both is and is not. In saying "He cannot be destroyed" simply affirms His invincibility. Tell me what would a Being like God "do"?

Originally Posted by Universal Mind

Strawman arguments. Nobody here has claimed either of those.

I said he could destroy himself and that he is supposed to be infinite, which would make him unlimited. You are giving him finite qualities. I'm not. I am, however, saying the fictitious character does not actually exist.

Those arguments have been elsewhere, and they are absurd. You actually just argued that God's Omnipotence doesn't exist because of itself.