(Thread title for another R/S debate.)

[mini0991]

(Rhetorical question with elements from a specific belief about something happening that isn't actually possible.) (An answer provided to prior question with semi-long rant about why I disagree with specified tenet of specified reiligion.) (Blatant insulting comment to members of a religious sect masquerading as an intelligent, witty comment about the religion itself, not the people.) (Invitation to discuss.)

[no-Name]

(Sassy remark about lack-of-time-to-reply, followed by several eye-rolling emoticons) (Solid defense of the religious thought process) (Logical fallacies concerning the religion itself) (Lack of awareness of the numerous contradictions, followed by a short religious prayer from aforementioned religion) __________________ (Oversized signature conveniently supporting the defended religion)

[Universal Mind]

(whining and persecution accusations concerning the fact that people are questioning religion in a religion forum) (fundamentalist talking point that has been shot down logically 250 quintillion to the 875 octillionth power times) (a teaching from the Bible that will be left behind and replaced by a new Bible teaching topic when somebody questions the original topic... process repeated as many times as necessary) (scoffs and other disses against very well established scientific methods accompanied by praises of ancient assertions)

[Maria92]

(Clear-headed individual shows excessive patience and respect) (Evading of issues presented and failure to acknowledge the many great points made by the clear-headed individual previously mentioned) (Clear-headed individual gets fed up and confronts fundamentalist) (Fundie gets offended and continues to evade question)