 Originally Posted by Mzzkc
Why would immediately defer to such an old, inherently flawed point of reference?
Whether you like it or not, your method is either a WILD or DILD, there is no other subset of LDs. By the definition I gave, which you'll be hard pressed to show is invalid, your method, as you've explained it, is a WILD..
I said it was a spin-off of WILD. In that post I didn't say that it wasn't something brand new, I just said that it was a spin-off that can possibly work.
Also, if you really are that picky about which tutorial I use, I will go ahead and change it to your guide. You happy?
On a separate note, even though you can sound like a dick sometimes, I'm actually a bit surprised you haven't been promoted to staff at all. Just saying.
|
|
Bookmarks