I know I've posted so many threads but this is just hard..

[Mzzkc]

I meant with my method, which is a spin-off of WILD, but it is different from the traditional WILD in several ways which I have already stated. From now on, when I say the traditional WILD, let's assume I mean the WILD tutorial in the Wiki. OK? Why would immediately defer to such an old, inherently flawed point of reference? Whether you like it or not, your method is either a WILD or DILD, there is no other subset of LDs. By the definition I gave, which you'll be hard pressed to show is invalid, your method, as you've explained it, is a WILD. I really don't know why you're having so much difficulty understanding such simple points.