Originally Posted by tommo
Also, once my dad's surgery got broken in to and the cops did find a muddy shoe print, he stepped in the mud outside and left a print inside, the cops already assumed it was some guy that had robbed a lot of places previously or something.
But they knew who it was based on that and convicted him once they found all the stuff at his house.
So it really depends on the case I think, sometimes they probably would bother looking for evidence, other times they would have no clue, and it probably would be a waste of money to do so.
I guess it depends on the case as you said. The first one they smashed the glass and broke the door in, took a few things, tried to lift the TV (had lots of dust on it), but left it when it was too hard, then went out the other door and kept it wide open. I lived at a busy street there. The second time they used some lawn shears that was in the carport, pried the window open, walked in and laid some of our grocery bags down in different places, i guess they figured we were out at work. Someone spooked them because they left the bags laying on the floor in the basement, didn't take anything from upstairs but they took my backpack with my work vest/shirt/shoes in them....rofl! basement door was unlocked. They barely took anything, and the things they did take were worth nothing. Druggies for sure. No PRINTS! were taken, he said it was most likely druggies because how lame the robbery was, and recently drug addicts have moved into that area and causing trouble, native indians.
|
|
Bookmarks