Long rant, got too into the analogy, sorry.
I watched those videos too a while ago. That guy isn't describing discrete layers that really exist. He's just putting labels on his feelings of awareness/vividness. There's nothing wrong with that, it's natural to try to organize things into categories, but in reality it's more complicated. There are many elements to lucid dreams and each one can be anywhere from strong to weak or different from anything you've felt before.
It's like putting the labels 'child', 'teenager', 'adult' and 'senior' on people. Every one has its tendencies, and it helps to use the labels, but in reality each individual person won't fit into one category. Ex: a really mature 17 year old who has the intelligence of a 35 year old but a playful nature like a 9 year old. It would be hard to place that person in the 'teenager' category when immaturity, rebelliousness, a mediocre seriousness, etc. are descriptions of the teenager category. But for legal reasons, age is identified by the number of years the person has been out of the womb, and it's understood that it's really more complicated, so I'm fine with it.
But this 'layers of lucid dreaming' thing I'm more opposed to because they're too specific and I don't see any reason for making them up other than to confuse people. It's like trying to fit people into age categories solely on their personality traits when there is no legal reason to do so. It might be helpful to loosely define someone who is dependent and immature and is still learning about the world as a child, just as it would be helpful to define a lucid dream in which you aren't very aware and that isn't very vivid as a poor lucid dream, but the categories he claims exist are too specific. It's like he's defining children as immature, dependent, lives with parents, etc. when there do exist children who are homeless and don't live with their parents, who are mature for their ages, etc. He just doesn't seem to leave much breathing room.
While I was following that, I kept experiencing this hybrid lucid dreams which didn't seem to fit under any category. So I'm not opposed to the idea of categorizing lucid dreams, but there would have to be less categories, maybe 2 or 3, and it would have to be obvious how every dream fits into every one. I guess if you were gathering statistics and needed to know how 'good' people's lucid dreams were, it might help to develop a couple categories. But in general I find it works better to rate every quality seperately (vividness, length, awareness that you're dreaming).
And this guy is way off by his last layer in which he claims you're really traveling to different dimensions or some s***.
|
|
Bookmarks