
Originally Posted by
Wolfwood
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
Facts alone:
1. LaBerges results are irrelevant to answering the question of whether time dilation can occur or not. This is clearly evident based on the methodology. If you believe otherwise, then state how his results imply either for/against.
2. We cannot argue that it is possible or it is not. objectively and conclusively speaking. No experiment have been conducted measuring time dilation during dreams. That is the fact. Thus, no one can say: 'it is possible' or 'it is not'.
Simple.
Bookmarks