I find myself agreeing with Hugh, both for the reasons he presented in the OP and also for the reasons Zoth and Ctharlhie present.
Dream control, as Zoth said quite well, is lucid dreaming. In a sense, it is a side-effect of the presence of your waking-life self-awareness in a dream: you know you're dreaming, so you know this world around you isn't real, and, especially after your awareness matures in the LD's, you will know that you can do anything in your dream, whether you had planned to do so or not. [ps: for what it's worth, this is the only route to real dream control; there are no shortcuts or techniques to get you there without self-awareness]
So, since dream control is lucid dreaming, does it really make sense to belittle it with techniques and rules, or rather to elevate rules and techniques above the simple and profound nature of dream control? I don't think so... For instance, I broke the three "rules" Ctharlhie noted (don't force things to happen, don't have sex, whatever you do, don't close your eyes) many times without any damage to my awareness. It may have taken some time to be able to do these things easily without waking up, but that time wasn't spent practicing clever techniques or even the things themselves, but instead building my self-awareness, effectively maturing my Self in dreams. Control came along for the ride.
Dream control is a reflection of your presence in a dream, and in my opinion isn't conducive to rules, techniques, or, of course, limits. In fact, its establishment as a "thing that needs to be done," or, worse, "can't be done," may doom many new dreamers to a path of attempting to do stuff, much of it artificial (as in not of their own invention), rather than explore the world they create for themselves every night. And, sadly, they'll likely fail because their incorrect rendition of dream control will cause them to ignore its real nature. Also, as Hugh noted, they'll have an expectation of failure due both to reading all these threads and finding during the dream that their attempt isn't going exactly as prescribed in what they read.
I remember a long time ago I was talking with a group of LD'ers who had me absolutely baffled: they were telling me all these things about dream control, all these rules, and, when I looked at them and asked rhetorically if dream control wasn't simply a part of LD'ing, they just looked at me funny... the damage was already done.
Also, for what it's worth, I feel that all of you are right, at least partially: dream control may be a natural, literally unavoidable part of LD'ing and it's not a good idea to list so many rules, limits, and negative statements about "achieving" it, but it's going to be talked about regardless. So a forum for it, staffed by responsible dream guides, is likely unavoidable.
tl;dr: Hugh and Zoth, hell, all of you are right: a dream control forum serves to misrepresent it and is fraught with destructive negativity, but the best we can do is treat posts responsibly and avoid elevating rules, techniques, and that negativity.
|
|
Bookmarks