No, but we there are many finite resources which can be recycled indefinitely. The components of food, for instance. Or construction materials like metal. |
|
Thank you what? Is the Earth an isolated system? No. Is globalisation thus inherently unsustainable? No. |
|
Looks like you're the one losing track of the conversation with all those questions. |
|
Globalisation doesn't mean 'shipping off all your resources to another country'. Obviously that would cause everybody in your country to starve to death, for starters. It's a nonsense definition... |
|
Except that they would have to grow more of their respective fruits to trade. Which means destroying more forests to create more farmland. Which means further unbalancing of the ecosystem there. |
|
It really doesn't have to create an imbalance, just do it in a way that doesn't abuse nature. Not really that hard, though admittedly it isn't often isn't done that way. But that's just because people are completely out of touch with what they eat and what products they use. They really don't care where it came from or how it was made as long as it's cheap. That's the problem, not trade. I really think people need to put more blame on lazy selfish consumers. |
|
They can only be recycled indefinitely if we don't add linings, bonding agents, or tamper with them... unfortunately for aluminum, we DO that stuff, so we lose some recyclable aluminum every time we recycle it, and it goes to landfill. |
|
Yes, clearly we can do better. Although short of firing it into space, you're never really going to lose it; the atoms are still on Earth. Those things aren't recycled because it's not economical; not because it's not possible. If you're willing to use your resources of entropy, you can get it back. |
|
If they're eating oranges... :/ |
|
Oranges make good wine. |
|
We already produce enough food to feed everyone. But if everyone can eat, food loses its value. |
|
Last edited by Omnis Dei; 12-10-2011 at 02:59 AM.
Everything works out in the end, sometimes even badly.
We easily produce enough food for everyone in the world. The biggest problem we currently have is the food distribution system, and actually getting food to everyone in the world. Though if more food was produce locally that would help a lot. In the future we might end up growing more with hydroponics as well. They already are using that a lot in other countries. The US doesn't bother because we have a lot of farm land but eventually we will start switching over to it as well, since its far more efficient. |
|
And the farmland gets destroyed because of mono-cropping. |
|
Well, that's a current problem, not an inherent one. There's no reason we couldn't decide tomorrow to start rotating crops, and continue to feed everybody. I'm asking if it's possible that we could decide tomorrow to stop using oil, and still (theoretically) feed everybody. |
|
We most definitely could do it sustainably, and even more efficiently than we do now. We don't currently do it because we are lazy and energy is still relatively cheap and water is relatively plentiful. It would be a pretty big shock if we no longer had oil and had to switch over night, which could happen if people lack the foresight to start moving to more sustainable practices now, but there are some already doing it. The US is just slow though, because we got it nice and there doesn't seem to be any urgency. |
|
Soil depletion, Dead zones and other destructive consequences of are a result of farms coping with our anachronistic agronomic structure. The pursuit of efficiency has overwhelmed the pursuit of sustainability. Many farmers are still researching sustainable methods and making a living selling locally to restaurants. It would be nice to see a structure in place that would allow this sustainable research to become mainstream practice. |
|
Everything works out in the end, sometimes even badly.
This is part of what we're working on in one of my sustainability courses; we have been contacting local organizations and companies/restaurants that serve food and connecting them with local farmers and catering companies that use locally-sourced foods. They have more seasonal menus to keep things fresh and local. It's happening more and more, if you find the right catering companies and restaurants you can get this. (While I don't care much for Chipotle's food, they do this well; each location head works with local farms to bring in local meats and vegetables. It works for them, although the price for food is a couple dollars more and the profit margin is a little less, people are willing to pay for it.) |
|
This is great. And is along the lines of what I was talking about. Using what the area will allow. |
|
Bookmarks