You are ignoring UM's other points. Are you just refusing to acknowledge them because you agree or because you can't argue against them? You could be totally right about what you are saying, but that doesn't prove that it's the wrong corner of the wrong building. It proves the guy was being a sensationalist asshole who didn't do enough investigation because he was too lazy, didn't want to because it went against his point, or is just stupid. However, that only proves that she does not go through the wood. Alright, point established. What is your argument for the building or the corner being different than the one he claims it to be? You can see from the third video and the aerial that it is indeed the corner he claims, the pole sticking up off the wooden corner is in both shots and the angle and view matches as well. If you want to claim that the camera field of view has been lowered on the news videos then that is one thing, but it is clearly the same corner. |
|
Bookmarks