Thread: Sandy Hook Conspiracy Theorists cyber stalking victims' and survivors' families

Edit: I basically say what you say Tiresias, and less well/concise - I just didn't read back, planning on my response on the actors only - so doubling rant - just saw it in OP's quote - soz..

Originally Posted by Universal Mind

It takes a really good actor to be able to cry at will. It's very difficult to do. They had to use actors who were willing to never act in front of a big audience again, so they didn't exactly get the cream of the crop.

Why do you believe they are actors in the first place?
Because their behaviour in front of a camera seems inconsistent with what you expect - they seem happy and smile, or fail to lament, look downcast, yammer, accuse god or whatever fits your stereotype.
Why on earth would a paid actor behave inconsistently, and not feed the universally known stereotypes to the audience, exactly when knowing that she is filmed?
And instead act unusually?

It is not that you see something, which looks like sad parents, and you miss the actual physical tears, and that's why you believe they are actors.
No - you believe they are, because of what would be plain lowest quality and incompetent acting if it were acting.
These supposedly suspicious people are giving whole suspicious interviews - don't you think it's bloody unlikely being orchestrated?
Just plain weird reality is what it is.

Oh - and something groundbreakingly new - some people can't even let go among their family and openly cry real tears - men especially.
You miss the behaviour and mimics - not the water per se (which can be produced by using irritants by the way).

How much do you think, the government paid these supposed actors to never act again??
How much do you think, the whole thing has cost the government?
Several millions, all things considered, even without paying off people's future careers.
How much would you have to pay the other people - not directly acting as parents?
Do you believe, it is likely that not one fell to the incentive and blew the whistle - somebody actually involved?
Out of hundreds of people who needed to be in the know on-scene and the ones behind?
There is always somebody letting out the secret with so many involved - esp. since there is this hunger of the sensation-lusting audience of this smear-campaign and it's lobbyists.




And - do you guys and gals really think, a thing of that magnitude has been staged and nothing of any magnitude has actually followed?
If it was staged with an agenda - something had to be done shortly afterwards in order to benefit from it - and nothing of any relevance did.

What do you think was the purpose of it exactly?
You think, the "secret government forces" have nothing better to do than stage such a thing, in order to skew the general mood away from the gun-nuts?? Try to pass a toothless law?

Poor parents - how heartless towards them to accuse them of acting - I really hope, they don't go on harassing people directly - it is despicable!
Imagine for a moment, you are mistaken, and it did take place - how would you feel?
Would you go on the net at all?