Thread: Unknown ancient(sacred)geometry

As far as I can see, they're just circles. There's really nothing all that geometrically remarkable going on there.

Originally Posted by thegnome54

As far as I can see, they're just circles. There's really nothing all that geometrically remarkable going on there.

They're obviously magic you close-minded skeptic!!! >:{

Originally Posted by Mark75

They're obviously magic you close-minded skeptic!!! >:{

Right on, brother! Now get a crowbar and some healing amethyst and open that evil skeptics mind!

I'll just finish smoking this nutmeg first.

so the people who say it is sacred have no reason to say so? They just said "oh, this looks cool, it must have some magic in it!"

Originally Posted by tkdyo

so the people who say it is sacred have no reason to say so? They just said "oh, this looks cool, it must have some magic in it!"

Isn't that what happened with

Crystal Healing
Healing Pyramids
Magnet Healing
Four-Leaved Clovers
"Dragon Bones" (i.e. Gigantopithecus fossils)
Tattoos
Mirrors
Crystal Balls
And perhaps Chuck Norris?

Originally Posted by thegnome54

Isn't that what happened with
perhaps Chuck Norris?

How dare you take Chuck Norris's name in vain!!! He shall smite thee with his powerful roundhouse kick and chest hairs of iron wool!!

In all seriousness, I guess it has, but those at least have a history, albeit religious, that people can go on, I have not heard of such a thing for this sacred geometry. And, what does it do? Most of those things we say heals, or brings good luck, or something else. What is this suppose to do?

Originally Posted by thegnome54

As far as I can see, they're just circles. There's really nothing all that geometrically remarkable going on there.

And the theory of relativity (e=mc squared) is just letters to someone ignorant of the principles and concepts behind it.

Hadn't picked on the Gnome in awhile.

Originally Posted by The Cusp

And the theory of relativity (e=mc squared) is just letters to someone ignorant of the principles and concepts behind it.

Hadn't picked on the Gnome in awhile.

could you then explain the implications of these circles? I am actually interested in this and dont listen with one ear shut like most skeptics do. However, I dont just except things without at least a good idea of what these circles are suppose to do rather than they are "just sacred"

There is so much information packed into those circles I couldn't even begin to explain it. All the platonic solids are in there, every religious symbol, you name it. Things like the Ying-Yang symbol weren't invented, they were discovered.

For a better idea of what can be done with those circles, check out
http://www.charlesgilchrist.com/SGEO/YSGCB.html

For a better understanding of what they represent, read David Wilcock's Convergence.
http://www.dprins.demon.nl/convergence/index.html
You may want to start with part 2, the Harmonic Structure of Dimensions, but the whole thing is a good read.

If higher dimensions are too much to wrap your head around, you could check out the book Flatland to soften up you melon. It's about a bunch of 2d beings unaware of the third spatial dimension. It's been made into several movies, of which I've only been able to find clips on you tube.
Book: http://www.gutenberg.org/dirs/etext94/flat11.txt
A short clip that illustrates the point : http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=BWyTxCsIXE4

My interest in this stems from some reoccurring dreams I had as a child which involved the platonic solids. Seriously, there is no good reason that my 4 year old self would dream of the platonic solids. I could barely tie my shoes at the time! And I'm not the only one.
That particular topic had turned into the single biggest non-general thread in the Nightmare and reoccurring dreams section of this forum.
http://www.dreamviews.com/community/...ad.php?t=29794

I feel like a simple grid would harbor just as much 'information', wouldn't it?

I also can't see any ying-yangs in there - could you point them out for me?

You dreaming of platonic solids is odd, but remember that platonic solids do not exist in nature. They are merely a generalization that we humans have created to describe various things with roughly similar shapes. In that sense, things like the ying-yang were very much invented.

Originally Posted by thegnome54

but remember that platonic solids do not exist in nature. They are merely a generalization that we humans have created to describe various things with roughly similar shapes.

Where do you come up with this stuff? Crystals are composed entirely of of the platonic solids. Over and over, the same tiny building blocks repeating until they form a large one.

And then consider the Atomic Structure of matter. See the pictures on this site. http://193.49.43.3/dif/3D-crystals/index.html
Nothing but platonic solids and sacred geometry, all of which is contained in those "cirlcles". The very shapes themselves explain the properties matter has.

As for finding the ying yang, take a closer look at this picture from that charlesgilchrest site. The lines aren't very clear. You can see it better if you print it out.




The whole sacred aspect was not put forth by the people who studied and developed these concepts, but by the people who didn't understand it.

You may be interested to know,someone`s taken notice of my discovery. http://www.world-mysteries.com/sar_sage1 http://www.dnaalchemy.com/Complete_Flower_of_Life.html