A major problem for evelution is the origion of information. This orgion of information shakes the whole unnderpinning of which Evolution sits on.

The main scientific objection to Evolution is not that changes occur through time, and neither is it about the size of the change. The key issue is the type of change required—to change microbes into men requires changes that increase the genetic information content. The three billion DNA ‘letters’ stored in each human cell nucleus convey a great deal more information (known as ‘specified complexity’) than the over half a million DNA ‘letters’ of the ‘simplest’ self-reproducing organism. The DNA sequences in a ‘higher’ organism, such as a human being or a horse, for instance, code for structures and functions unknown in the sort of ‘primitive first cell’ from which all other organisms are said to have evolved.

None of the alleged proofs of ‘evolution in action’ provide a single example of functional new information being added to genes. Rather, they all involve sorting and loss of information. To claim that mere change proves that information-increasing change can occur is like saying that because a merchant can sell goods, he can sell them for a profit. The origin of information is a major problem for Evolution

Note: This is not my work, this guys said what i wanted to say but say's better than me.

And the natraul selction, Why would an animal grow wing stubs if it was really survival of the fittest. The wing stubs would slow them down and make them less mobile and easier for a predator to attack.

Im still 50/50 on evolution. I just need answears.