Thread: Proof of Apollo 11 Fraud Lunar Landing

I don't really care whether this was staged back then...

We are probably able now do make a moonlanding, so whatever...
I don't care...

But WHY???
Why would they stage such a thing?
That's really the only thing I'd like to know...

Originally Posted by CryoDragoon

I don't really care whether this was staged back then...

We are probably able now do make a moonlanding, so whatever...
I don't care...

But WHY???
Why would they stage such a thing?
That's really the only thing I'd like to know...

Deterrance.

Let us not forget the wars at the time.

Nuclear weapons and computers are brother and sister.

However, I would not suggest debating about the truth of it or not; none of us are truly involved in the matter. I just think it is interesting to scrutinize the data.

~

Theres one thing that bothers me; this mirror argument. I've heard about the mirror on the moon plenty of times and since I've never doubted the lunar landing, its been good enough for me but this video is awfully convincing and it makes me wonder; has anyone here actually seen this mirror, or bounced laser beams off of it? Everyone I've ever heard talk about it hasn't actually seen it for themselves. If NASA is lying, they could just as easily be lying about the mirror. Has anyone seen it or at least know someone else who has seen it for themselves?

Originally Posted by Xaqaria

Theres one thing that bothers me; this mirror argument. I've heard about the mirror on the moon plenty of times and since I've never doubted the lunar landing, its been good enough for me but this video is awfully convincing and it makes me wonder; has anyone here actually seen this mirror, or bounced laser beams off of it? Everyone I've ever heard talk about it hasn't actually seen it for themselves. If NASA is lying, they could just as easily be lying about the mirror. Has anyone seen it or at least know someone else who has seen it for themselves?

You would need a pretty powerful laser and a way to analyze the telemetry. All I can do is get sources but any conspiracy theorists would conveniently claim that they are fake.

As for the video, I didn't see any conclusive evidence whatsoever, the narrator just claims stuff the whole time.

That video makes me laugh. Especially the comments. But you know the funniest part? I could make people believe grass is blue with the right 'evidence' and witty wording.

Originally Posted by Spartiate

You would need a pretty powerful laser and a way to analyze the telemetry. All I can do is get sources but any conspiracy theorists would conveniently claim that they are fake.

As for the video, I didn't see any conclusive evidence whatsoever, the narrator just claims stuff the whole time.

Personally, I think the shot of Neil Armstrong in between the camera and the window with the Earth completely filling the window is pretty convincing. What do you think?

Originally Posted by Xaqaria

Personally, I think the shot of Neil Armstrong in between the camera and the window with the Earth completely filling the window is pretty convincing. What do you think?

I'm not saying there is nothing to that, but I don't understand how the narrator knew that was Neil Armstrong's arm, why saying that a window was "completely filled up by a T.V. camera" meant the camera had to be physically touching the window and not just capturing the whole window in the image, or how the narrator knew that if the camera were touching the window, Earth would have had a smaller image (especially considering how cameras can zoom in and out). Can anybody explain those claims and back them up with anything other than the narrator's assertions? I also don't get why they didn't bring in any experts to interview for that part of the documentary. They didn't show any official text or other documentation. They showed nothing that backs up the assertions. They just had a narrator saying things. They should do better than that when making such enormous claims.

If the moon landing was really a fake, it would be one of the biggest trips I have ever come across. I would love to know that truth if it is the truth.

Originally Posted by Universal Mind

I'm not saying there is nothing to that, but I don't understand how the narrator knew that was Neil Armstrong's arm, why saying that a window was "completely filled up by a T.V. camera" meant the camera had to be physically touching the window and not just capturing the whole window in the image, or how the narrator knew that if the camera were touching the window, Earth would have had a smaller image (especially considering how cameras can zoom in and out). Can anybody explain those claims and back them up with anything other than the narrator's assertions? I also don't get why they didn't bring in any experts to interview for that part of the documentary. They didn't show any official text or other documentation. They showed nothing that backs up the assertions. They just had a narrator saying things. They should do better than that when making such enormous claims.

If the moon landing was really a fake, it would be one of the biggest trips I have ever come across. I would love to know that truth if it is the truth.

I'm not talking about the arm, I'm talking about the part which the narrator says that they were not intending to tape at all in which the lights come on and you can clearly see Neil fully in front of the camera with the window behind him and the Earth taking up the entire window.

Originally Posted by Xaqaria

I'm not talking about the arm, I'm talking about the part which the narrator says that they were not intending to tape at all in which the lights come on and you can clearly see Neil fully in front of the camera with the window behind him and the Earth taking up the entire window.

I don't remember that. About where in the video is it? And what proves that if Earth takes up the entire window they are nowhere near the moon?

Nasa needed $$ to start up ! how do u think they could have done it without making the whole population believe they landed on moon? ahahaha.... i was watching soem clips which were shown world wide, people holdingtheyr hands with tears all around the world.

Not knowing that in 40 years people would have discovered that its fake. Gosh, how dare they ruin our pride just for the sake of $$.