I think you're wording it wrong. The energy in existence originated with existence as opposed to within it. So we still need to explain existence but our theories of physics tell us that the energy came along for free. Does that make any sense? |
|
Yeah, it doesn't work as a good model for a perpetual motion machine that can transfer energy outside of itself. My main deal with this is that the energy in existence originated within existence, but taking that idea to a smaller machine raises the issue of the creation of energy, which probably really is not possible. |
|
How do you know you are not dreaming right now?
I think you're wording it wrong. The energy in existence originated with existence as opposed to within it. So we still need to explain existence but our theories of physics tell us that the energy came along for free. Does that make any sense? |
|
Previously PhilosopherStoned
Yeah, I think that's probably it. The energy must be as "old" as existence itself, unless history's master physicists are way off and energy can be created as opposed to transferred. |
|
How do you know you are not dreaming right now?
Bookmarks