• Lucid Dreaming - Dream Views




    Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
    Results 1 to 25 of 73
    1. #1
      Queen of insomnia marlie's Avatar
      Join Date
      Apr 2008
      Gender
      Posts
      342
      Likes
      4
      DJ Entries
      1

      There has to be an answer

      Ok so.. Im sure this thread wont last long, mostly because i doubt i can express my question here as clear as it seems in my head.. but lets see ..

      Is there any single living creature on earth that is completely pointless?
      I am at work so i have lots of daydreaming and pointless thinking time.. so i have been eliminating options in my head since about.. five minutes after i arrived ( watch out for the "ive been fired"thread later) and my mind naturally jumped to the creatures i dislike most.. spiders- eat flys, flys-feed frogs, fleas- keep vets wealthy, germs-keep whole industrys alive. I guess you could argue that most creatures COULD be eaten, but not all of those would count as im not looking for what could be eaten, rather what is frequently eaten. like im sure you could eat a lemurs balls but unless there is evidence that something does, i wouldnt count that.
      There has to be something completely pointless, which isnt eaten, making people money, contributing anything to the world.
      any suggestions?


      My Dream Journal
      An erection doesnt count as personal growth.

    2. #2
      Expert LDer Affirmation!
      Join Date
      Oct 2008
      Gender
      Posts
      1,556
      Likes
      1010
      Interesting thoughts. I think everything that exists has a purpose or it would have been weeded out by nature by now. Though I don't think 'making humans money' is a valid enough reason for something to exist. There has to be more to it. Most things have existed and had a purpose long before our tiny little fraction of advanced human history.

      Quote Originally Posted by marlie View Post
      germs-keep whole industrys alive.
      Germs and bacteria are really the most prosperous creatures on the planet, outnumbering the number of humans on it multiple times, and we are all alive at their mercy. Bacteria keeps us healthy, but can also make a sick. If bacteria was ever advanced enough to decide to get rid of us, we'd all be dead, just like that.

      So yeah, I think they're kind of important. The purpose of something doesn't revolve around us anyway.
      DILDs: A Lot

    3. #3
      Member Bonsay's Avatar
      Join Date
      Sep 2006
      Gender
      Location
      In a pot.
      Posts
      2,706
      Likes
      60
      Pandas
      C:\Documents and Settings\Akul\My Documents\My Pictures\Sig.gif

    4. #4
      LD's this year: ~7 tommo's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jan 2007
      Gender
      Location
      Melbourne
      Posts
      9,202
      Likes
      4986
      DJ Entries
      7
      Yep Pandas lol, they should be dead by now. Maybe they helped stop the bamboo from growing everywhere, but we do a good enough job of that now so....

      BTW your reasons for the things you mentioned sucked. DeeryTheDeer's post explains why.

      Sloths, humans.

      Depends what your definition of pointful and pointless is.

    5. #5
      Banned
      Join Date
      Jul 2007
      Gender
      Location
      The Weak and the Wounded
      Posts
      4,925
      Likes
      485
      Quote Originally Posted by marlie View Post
      There has to be something completely pointless, which isnt eaten, making people money, contributing anything to the world.
      any suggestions?

      Very anthropocentric view of the world there.

      Something's pointless if it doesn't have a use by humans huh?

      Really Marlie, really? Can you not yourself reflect and see how silly this is?

    6. #6
      Queen of insomnia marlie's Avatar
      Join Date
      Apr 2008
      Gender
      Posts
      342
      Likes
      4
      DJ Entries
      1
      Quote Originally Posted by Carôusoul View Post
      Very anthropocentric view of the world there.

      Something's pointless if it doesn't have a use by humans huh?

      Eaten could mean eaten by anything- not neccesarily a human, contributing to the earth could mean.. polination. Its only human based in your mind, not mine.

      Really Marlie, really? Can you not yourself reflect and see how silly this is?
      Its not silly to discuss things that arent of interest to YOU.. its an open forum... dont like my thread, please skip past it.
      sigh


      My Dream Journal
      An erection doesnt count as personal growth.

    7. #7
      Queen of insomnia marlie's Avatar
      Join Date
      Apr 2008
      Gender
      Posts
      342
      Likes
      4
      DJ Entries
      1
      Quote Originally Posted by tommo View Post
      Yep Pandas lol, they should be dead by now. Maybe they helped stop the bamboo from growing everywhere, but we do a good enough job of that now so....

      BTW your reasons for the things you mentioned sucked. DeeryTheDeer's post explains why.

      Sloths, humans.

      I dont know much about sloths, but you could have the answer with humans, we do more harm than good to the earth, really i am looking at it from the planets point of view.. rather than a human one... if thats possible.. i dunno.. its a slow day at work.. and as i suspected i couldnt quite put into words what was in my head lol.
      Depends what your definition of pointful and pointless is.
      .


      My Dream Journal
      An erection doesnt count as personal growth.

    8. #8
      ex-redhat ClouD's Avatar
      Join Date
      Sep 2007
      Posts
      4,760
      Likes
      129
      DJ Entries
      1
      Pandas may exist for our amusement. Our amusement exists for? Then that which exists for our amusement exists for? Ad infinitum.

      Reasons are illogical on an objective scale.
      You merely have to change your point of view slightly, and then that glass will sparkle when it reflects the light.

    9. #9
      LD's this year: ~7 tommo's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jan 2007
      Gender
      Location
      Melbourne
      Posts
      9,202
      Likes
      4986
      DJ Entries
      7
      Exactly what I was thinking cloud. We have to define pointful and pointless first.

      I know what the most important animal is though, can anyone guess it? By most important I mean no other animal could survive without them if they were to die right now.

    10. #10
      Banned
      Join Date
      Jul 2007
      Gender
      Location
      The Weak and the Wounded
      Posts
      4,925
      Likes
      485
      Quote Originally Posted by marlie View Post
      sigh
      you heavily implied that it was use by humans, that's why all the other posts have independently recognised that.



      also it doesn't matter if it's of interest to me, i was pointing it out because i think you're wrong in how you think.

    11. #11
      Xei
      UnitedKingdom Xei is offline
      Banned
      Join Date
      Aug 2005
      Posts
      9,984
      Likes
      3084
      Interesting thoughts. I think everything that exists has a purpose or it would have been weeded out by nature by now.
      That doesn't really make any sense.

      What do you mean by purpose? Do you mean to provide some kind of natural harmony? That's not really true, organisms exist to recreate themselves, not serve a higher purpose.

      And if by purpose you in fact mean 'to exist and hence reproduce themselves'; well, then there have never been any organisms without purpose so it's an empty statement.

    12. #12
      Queen of insomnia marlie's Avatar
      Join Date
      Apr 2008
      Gender
      Posts
      342
      Likes
      4
      DJ Entries
      1
      Quote Originally Posted by Carôusoul View Post
      you heavily implied that it was use by humans, that's why all the other posts have independently recognised that.

      how so exactly? eaten could have been by anything, human or otherwise, infact the only part of my post that was specifically human related.. were just 2 of infinite points possible to make

      also it doesn't matter if it's of interest to me, i was pointing it out because i think you're wrong in how you think.
      theres no wrong or right because u took what i said as a completely literal statement, and ignored the fact that i was asking for peoples input, not claiming to know the answer, i started this thread because i am feeding a small thought i had to see where other peoples thought process took it


      Pherhaps i should have started a thread on catgirls or manga.. may have been more accepted... god forbid anyone attempts a thought process different to everyone elses here.


      My Dream Journal
      An erection doesnt count as personal growth.

    13. #13
      ├┼┼┼┼┤
      Join Date
      Jun 2006
      Gender
      Location
      Equestria
      Posts
      6,315
      Likes
      1191
      DJ Entries
      1
      I think this is the question marlie meant to ask:

      Is there any organism on Earth that could be removen completely, without any other organisms being affected in any way, at all, directly or indirectly?

      ---------
      Lost count of how many lucid dreams I've had
      ---------

    14. #14
      Banned
      Join Date
      Jul 2007
      Gender
      Location
      The Weak and the Wounded
      Posts
      4,925
      Likes
      485
      Quote Originally Posted by Marvo View Post
      I think this is the question marlie meant to ask:

      Is there any organism on Earth that could be removen completely, without any other organisms being affected in any way, at all, directly or indirectly?
      This is better.

    15. #15
      Xei
      UnitedKingdom Xei is offline
      Banned
      Join Date
      Aug 2005
      Posts
      9,984
      Likes
      3084
      I suppose then the biological term would be a single-species ecosystem.

      *Googles*.

      http://ecoworldly.com/2008/10/11/sci...arths-surface/

      Wow. That's incredible.

      Marlie, the answer is 'yes' in the sense that they don't interact with any other species.

      However if that makes them pointless then by induction everything is pointless.

    16. #16
      Queen of insomnia marlie's Avatar
      Join Date
      Apr 2008
      Gender
      Posts
      342
      Likes
      4
      DJ Entries
      1
      Quote Originally Posted by Marvo View Post
      I think this is the question marlie meant to ask:

      Is there any organism on Earth that could be removen completely, without any other organisms being affected in any way, at all, directly or indirectly?
      Thankyou Marvo.. you got me completely,that is exactly what i was trying to ask.. in a roundabout, cackhanded sleep deprived way


      My Dream Journal
      An erection doesnt count as personal growth.

    17. #17
      Queen of insomnia marlie's Avatar
      Join Date
      Apr 2008
      Gender
      Posts
      342
      Likes
      4
      DJ Entries
      1
      Quote Originally Posted by ClouD View Post
      Pandas may exist for our amusement. Our amusement exists for? Then that which exists for our amusement exists for? Ad infinitum.

      Reasons are illogical on an objective scale.
      you make my tiny brain hurt


      My Dream Journal
      An erection doesnt count as personal growth.

    18. #18
      Sleeping Dragon juroara's Avatar
      Join Date
      May 2006
      Gender
      Location
      San Antonio, TX
      Posts
      3,866
      Likes
      1172
      DJ Entries
      144
      Nature abhors a vacuum. Most of us have heard this classic phrase before. What does this mean for this question? Every living creature right now fills a niche in the eco-system, including man. If that creature were to disappear, it creates a vacuum, that another creature will fill.

      No creature is 'pointless' because everything is a part of a much larger picture. Even the so called pointless creatures that go extinct still played a role for evolution.

    19. #19
      Xei
      UnitedKingdom Xei is offline
      Banned
      Join Date
      Aug 2005
      Posts
      9,984
      Likes
      3084
      Quote Originally Posted by marlie View Post
      Thankyou Marvo.. you got me completely,that is exactly what i was trying to ask.. in a roundabout, cackhanded sleep deprived way
      I just answered the question. Hullo? I promise I'm not invisible.
      Nature abhors a vacuum. Most of us have heard this classic phrase before. What does this mean for this question? Every living creature right now fills a niche in the eco-system, including man. If that creature were to disappear, it creates a vacuum, that another creature will fill.

      No creature is 'pointless' because everything is a part of a much larger picture. Even the so called pointless creatures that go extinct still played a role for evolution.
      Yeah I just showed an example of how that isn't true.

      And why does evolution mean that it had a point? Because it led to the creation of more pointless creatures? How does that make it not pointless? Or are you thinking that it may have led to the evolution of man?

      This entire thread has a large anthropocentric bias. Once again, what exactly is the meaning of 'purpose'?
      Last edited by Xei; 01-20-2010 at 03:05 AM.

    20. #20
      No C n Gnossienne's Avatar
      Join Date
      Nov 2009
      Gender
      Location
      NY
      Posts
      64
      Likes
      7
      If you think about the butterfly effect, everything does interact with everything else eventually.
      but if everything has a purpose, then how special can having a purpose be?



      Quote Originally Posted by marlie View Post

      humans, we do more harm than good to the earth,
      But if a big meteor were to come crashing towards our planet, wouldn't human beings would be the only ones who
      could save the planet? By launching a nuclear bomb at it or something.


      Quote Originally Posted by marlie View Post
      Pherhaps i should have started a thread on catgirls or manga.. may have been more accepted... god forbid anyone attempts a thought process different to everyone elses here.
      It's good that your not afraid to express your opinion.
      That's just what all of us are doing also.
      Art:http://dreamviews.com/community/showthread.php?t=87532
      DILD/WBTB/MILD - 18
      WILD - 2
      Last LD - Jan 25th.

    21. #21
      LD's this year: ~7 tommo's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jan 2007
      Gender
      Location
      Melbourne
      Posts
      9,202
      Likes
      4986
      DJ Entries
      7
      Is anyone going to define pointful and pointless????
      3 people have said we need to do so yet no one had tried.
      I am looking to marlie since you started the thread.
      I know what the most important animal is though, can anyone guess it? By most important I mean no other animal could survive without them if they were to die right now.

    22. #22
      peyton manning Caprisun's Avatar
      Join Date
      Nov 2009
      Gender
      Location
      Indiana
      Posts
      548
      Likes
      68
      Quote Originally Posted by Bonsay View Post
      Pandas
      Ditto.

    23. #23
      Queen of insomnia marlie's Avatar
      Join Date
      Apr 2008
      Gender
      Posts
      342
      Likes
      4
      DJ Entries
      1
      Quote Originally Posted by tommo View Post
      Is anyone going to define pointful and pointless????
      3 people have said we need to do so yet no one had tried.
      I am looking to marlie since you started the thread.
      By pointless i meant, should it become extinct nothing else would notice/ be affected by its loss...

      Im sure though it could be argued that many specific insects would fall under that category.. because if they were food for another creature.. the creature would move onto another kind of insect.. pherhaps. So maybe it has to go deeper than "being part of a food chain"

      xei is gonna shout at me in a minute because he i guess answered probably as well as i could hope.. a single species eco system... would i assume.. cover that criteria.


      My Dream Journal
      An erection doesnt count as personal growth.

    24. #24
      ヽ(´ー`)ノ Tara's Avatar
      Join Date
      Mar 2008
      Gender
      Location
      Fangorn
      Posts
      854
      Likes
      813
      DJ Entries
      11
      Humans are pointless. We're parasites.

      "In general, parasites are much smaller than their hosts, show a high degree of specialization for their mode of life, and reproduce more quickly and in greater numbers than their hosts."
      We're smaller than the Earth, are very specialized in our lives having forced nature to adapt to us instead of the other way around, and reproduce to the point that we're not facing a serious population problem.

      "Parasites reduce host fitness in many ways, ranging from general or specialized pathology (such as castration), impairment of secondary sex characteristics, to the modification of host behaviour. Parasites increase their fitness by exploiting hosts for food, habitat and dispersal."
      We have modified the Earth's 'behaviour' (global warming - climate is acting differently than it should), we abuse resources regularly.

      The quotes are from Wikipedia.

      You take us off the Earth, nothing harmful happens. In fact, it would be the opposite. Plantation would take over (like in Chernobyl) once our technology stops running without our aid and eventually wildlife would bloom as well. The climate would return to normal, resources would replenish, etc.
      Last edited by Moose; 01-20-2010 at 12:52 PM.

    25. #25
      peyton manning Caprisun's Avatar
      Join Date
      Nov 2009
      Gender
      Location
      Indiana
      Posts
      548
      Likes
      68
      Quote Originally Posted by Moose View Post
      Humans are pointless. We're parasites.

      "In general, parasites are much smaller than their hosts, show a high degree of specialization for their mode of life, and reproduce more quickly and in greater numbers than their hosts."
      We're smaller than the Earth, are very specialized in our lives having forced nature to adapt to us instead of the other way around, and reproduce to the point that we're not facing a serious population problem.

      "Parasites reduce host fitness in many ways, ranging from general or specialized pathology (such as castration), impairment of secondary sex characteristics, to the modification of host behaviour. Parasites increase their fitness by exploiting hosts for food, habitat and dispersal."
      We have modified the Earth's 'behaviour' (global warming - climate is acting differently than it should), we abuse resources regularly.

      The quotes are from Wikipedia.

      You take us off the Earth, nothing harmful happens. In fact, it would be the opposite. Plantation would take over (like in Chernobyl) once our technology stops running without our aid and eventually wildlife would bloom as well. The climate would return to normal, resources would replenish, etc.


      Why such a negative view about humans? When talking about parasitic relationships, it only pertains to living organisms, not the earth. Otherwise almost every animal would be considered a parasite. There are also organisms with populations many times larger than ours, but they aren't parasites.

    Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast

    Bookmarks

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •