Originally Posted by Goldenspark
Hey Laurelindo, I do get your idea about wanting to believe in things mystical, and I have a degree of that myself. I don't expect cold hard logic before I believe in something. For a start we have to trust a lot of the science proof anyway, because there's no way we can understand it all. That sort of makes it like a religion.
As to the astral plane, I'm keeping an open mind but can't really believe in it.
The idea of some mystical connection either between dreamers or with the after life is a bit hard to swallow.
I just think that sometimes people see science as some sort of bad guy, and in order to rebel they believe in some pretty obscure stuff, when actually the natural world is so full of amazing things there's enough to keep anyone fascinated.
I'm all for a bit of escaping to fantasy, but I like to build up a picture of what science knows to be true so that I hope I know what is real (more or less).
I've always thought it's sort of ironic the way people vouch for science, as it seems that the most atheistic people are more fanatic than the most religious.
Intelligence is being able to perceive beliefs without the filter of your bias. If you can contemplate religion and science simultaneously, you might figure out more than just siding with either.
What is even more ironic is that religion can be understood scientifically, just as science can be viewed through a religious perspective. Religion starts with the understanding of spirituality and ends with the understanding of science, science begins with a physical means to an inevitably spiritual end. The bible describes not only prophecy, but scientific facts. Such as the function of reproductive organs, fundamental brain/sensory function, and the alchemical (and fractal) relationship between every conceptual process in the human body.
The problem with scientific opinion today in general (as i see it), is that people cling to a one sided view that disregards anything else. Isn't it strange that the most current and revolutionary discoveries within science reflect exactly what was prophesied by occult's and warned by religions? I think people are too scared to consider the truth about the spiritual realm. Because believing that would require the belief that your consciousness can exist outside of your brain, and your brain simply serves as a processor to translate your conscious awareness into a division of senses. It's remarkably difficult for some to take into consideration every ideology and conceptualize the truth in it's total breadth. As a result, is easy to decipher who cares more about the truth or their egotistical programming that they can't let go of. A person who only believes an exclusive branch of "truth" such as religion is just as ignorant as one who only considers science. It's also worth mentioning that an individual who is unwilling to consider an opposing argument does so as a result of not having the ability to actually disprove the opposing ideology. (because they don't even understand their own)
Making claims based on a theoretical ideology you can't prove or understand fully is just as ignorant as making claims based on the bible. And just because there is some truth in science, that does not imply everything science encompasses is true. Like assuming the earth is a sphere for example seems like a logical decision, yet the fact that there has been no legitimate pictures of the earth from space since 40 years ago makes that decision's validity a variable. Not to mention that picture was potentially faked as well. If something as simple as the shape of the earth we live on is hidden from the masses, then who's to say there isn't a groundbreaking explanation that would prove the truth once in for all. Unfortunately, the only way to find out would require letting go of current beliefs (science/religion), which is profoundly difficult for people who don't want their fragile ideology threatened by other possibilities.
To make this point as simple as possible, people who evolve their intellect while referencing their current understanding to a constant (ideology such as science), will not have the big picture perspective someone who uses a variable as their reference point will. (simply meaning that if you see your beliefs as something that can be changed, or evolved you will consider more of the story than if you were to see your beliefs as something concretely true and unchangeable.) Alternatively, the ignorant person serves their brain as the (constant) while the intelligent person's brain serves their consciousness (variable). This is important because the focus on spirituality is ancient, it is both science and religion, math and literally everything. The one constant which both religion and science share is god. Where religion began, science will end.
This all ties into the idea of: what is real? What your senses tell your consciousness? I'm sure you've all seen this:
If you can't define real, then why would you blindly trust a belief system? if you don't understand it, then you believe it in a form of fear. Where you are controlled by the external, instead of the true function of consciousness, which has been proven by the double slit experiment. Physics proved that consciousness collapses the wave function of potential to the focus shaped by expectation. the belief that Awareness dictates reality is the truth, and the belief that reality dictates awareness is the fear of the truth. This is just my opinion, but not just my truth. Maybe some people just aren't ready to critically think.
Personally i think collective knowledge explains a lot more than a fraction of the collective. Similarly, using all of your brain instead of half gets you the whole truth instead of a division of it.
Btw, the bible has an ultimatum that is very relevant to this topic. The choice between the spiritual world or the material world. the 666 (material) or the 999 (spiritual). What would you choose?
tumblr_n4uwnkIqXP1rs2iqso1_1280.jpg
This picture illustrates how the spiritual (consciousness) illuminates and gives life to the material (physical). Nothing exists unless you realize it.
Considering the source of this material world is the spiritual world, how far out would it be to assume that this material world we live in is "imagined" by the spiritual world?
The exact opposite of what "science" would tell you.
|
|
Bookmarks