 Originally Posted by Malahaoeste
Hi out there
Castaneda was fiction right?
Who knows? The evidence 'for' is anecdotal (Castaneda's books; Abelar's book; Donner-Grau's book); the evidence 'against' falls down when one examines it thoroughly.
There are four main accusations of fiction:
1) That the (Scientologist) author Richard de Mille wrote that Castaneda was recorded as being in the UCLA library, when he wrote that he was in Sonora - the infamous "library stack requests" accusation. However, this is a fake story, as de Mille had never written anything of the sort and never did. This accusation was first published on 27.04.98., which happened to be the day of Castaneda's death, which wasn't made public until a little over 2 months later. So, whoever published that fake story probably had inside information of Castaneda's death. One can check this info by custom date-searching the phrase "library stack requests". Usage of this accusation continues to this day;
2) That Castaneda's arboreal and mycological information regarding Sonora, was erroneous: to wit - that mushrooms and trees that Castaneda described 'didn't grow in the desert'. This accusation was disproved in 1968, when the mushroom collector R. Gordon Wasson published a correspondence between himself and Castaneda. There is also a seminal work entitled 'Sonoran Desert Mushrooms' which contains a many and varied catalogue of mushrooms of the Sonora region. This latter info hasn't stopped the same accusations being repeated down the years, right up to the present day;
3) That Castaneda lied about his birthplace and origin. He wrote and also always said in interviews that he was born and raised in Brazil, as also described in several of his books. He spoke fluent portuguese with a Sao Paolo regional accent (Veja radio interview). His spanish was not that great - neither was his english. All of his works in english were translated into english by professional translators, from a mixture of portuguese, spanish and english. In the 1970s, Time magazine published a purported birth certificate from 'FBI Immigration records', which they said was Castaneda's 'real' birth certificate from Peru. The problems with that are that there's no such thing as 'FBI Immigration records', there are many other people with the same name (check the telephone directories) and also there is no way that the cited document couldn't be faked;
4) That all of the concepts, ideas and philosophies as presented by Castaneda are plagiarised from other sources. Detractors claim to be able to prove this, by citing similar ideas from other works. Some authors have made careers from this. The problem is that one could find correlations between every belief system that exists: this in itself proves nothing. It also doesn't explain such writings as 'The Rule of the Nagual', 'The Abstract Cores' nor 'Not-Doings' nor 'Stalking', to mention but four.
So.. my personal jury is 'out' on Castaneda.
What is apparent is that there is a small but vocal cohort of fanatic Castaneda detractors out there on the web, who visit connected sites and who post false and misleading information and verbal attacks on those who question their assertions. Don't be surprised if they show up here. They've certainly been here before.
 Originally Posted by Malahaoeste
..but never once a dreamer that has, for instance, found (in their dream) the room where they are sleeping and found their dreaming body. Or touched the roof of their mouth with their tongue physically while dreaming and experienced the explosion of energy..
The 'glancing method' and the 'tongue trick' are good, as are the 'double fixation' and the 'pointing with little finger' techniques, too. One word of advice: don't 'touch' anything and don't let anything 'touch' you. Good luck.
|
|
Bookmarks