Thread: Guess I'm back... again

I remember my attempt at college. Guilt. Long before college, it was discovered that I had a very high IQ. I could see the mistakes in the school texts, one after another. I had set my mind early on to discover certain things, however, if I went to college, i would have to learn by rote--learn to repeat contradictions and non-sense. i tried, did quite well, won a couple writing awords, but I had to leave, could not put up with the guilt of conforming to what I could plainly see were gross errors. Then one gets the guilt of not going--and it lingers. However, I came to understand what I set out to do, and it don't matter much now anyway. I would rather people think I am odd, or crazy, than to have lived a life of repeating non-sense.

If you want to learn the language of the dream, you have to start with very specific questions. Then you have to learn to say what you see--not with just your eyes, but by abstracting the notion, the idea. The visual metaphor contains a great deal of information, it is a high level langauge.

Visual metaphor, used in dreams, is actually the foundation of all language. Plato tried to teach about language in his dialogs.

One of the first questions you should ask is "What are Lucid Dreams good for?"

That should give you an idea that there is or is not a purpose for them.

I once asked that question, and got this reply.

I was standing next to the white house, and in front of me was a sign, "Express C.M."

The white house is the seat of government. Since dreams refer to the self, it meant seat of judgment.

Express C.M. was written in English, so, I was to express C.M. in English--common grammar.

C.M. are intials. Many different name constructions have the same initials. I.e. C.M. determines class membership. I.e. definition is the method by which judgment is determined. Even down to the simple sentence.

After years of study, I have worked out a great deal. Enough to change ideas around the world--if I ever get something written. Just the simplicity of determining that Euclidean Geometry is the truest form of Geometry, and only needs one correction, takes down even Einstein--all science and theory based on non-Euclidean Geometry---this is simply because man does not yet know the foundation of grammar. When he does learn, then Predication is the inverse function of abstraction may just become a slogan for truth.

Where else does one find the claim that lucid dreaming is for the purpose of teaching man judgment? The Judeo-Christian Scripture which is also said to be sealed to man's understanding until someone brings a key to loosen those seals. It is not magic, it is just that if one does not think using principles of judgment, they cannot comprehend a text that uses them.

So, here I am, the nut case. Saying what has never before been said, instead of going to college and spending my life repeating what is politically correct and making money at it. oh well

.

i like how you always take your time to answer peoples post in a really indepth idea. Your great help and very intresting (the both of you) not that you need my aproval

Anyway thank you for contributing so much!

Originally Posted by dakotahnok

.

i like how you always take your time to answer peoples post in a really indepth idea. Your great help and very intresting (the both of you) not that you need my aproval

Anyway thank you for contributing so much!

Haha, I wish I had more time to contribute. I'm a lurker more than anything. It's just a shame the forums I'm most interested in (Beyond Dreaming, Inner Sanctum) aren't very active. And as I mentioned, I don't have any personal experience to go on... Still, you're welcome.