Quote Originally Posted by Jeff777 View Post
The problem Lëzen, is that the pictures were not "simple" or innocent as you're down playing them to be. They have serious implications. Pictures of that nature are not tolerated on DV.



Debate on DV is encouraged, not harsh name calling...that's where we step in. Perhaps you are confusing the two? At any rate, how you can compare fiery debates on DV to pedophile related pics not being allowed on DV is beyond me. So think what you may.
All I'm really saying is that everything - morals, concepts of right and wrong, appropriate or inappropriate - are highly, highly relative, and hardly anyone here seems to realize that. You would think it'd be common sense: "What may be right for me may not be right to you; therefore, agreeing to disagree is the best course of action." But no. Never happens. There's no actual name-calling in the "great" (feh!) debates around here, but there are always implications, ones that usually amount to the same thing. So sorry that some of you are too blind to see it.

Proof of the fact that this stuff is all relative? You didn't bother to delete the "gay views" or "lesbian views" ones. I personally don't have a problem with them, but I'm sure there are people who find those inappropriate. But alas, even though we're all equals here, it would seem that some of us are...shall we say...more equal than others?

One more thing. Is there anything wrong with spoiler tags? Are they not working, or...? Because, you know, I thought they did a pretty good job of hiding potentially objectionable content. Of course, why even give people the choice of viewing something at their own discretion when you can just silence the subject altogether by deleting it? Way to go, freedoms of choice, speech, and expression.