 Originally Posted by SourCherryBoy
I wonder, though... What makes, for example, red RED? The frequency of some little particles or the way we interpret that frequency? It's the good old tree-question, actually. When you see a tree, do you see something that's out there or something that is inside you. The relationship between a subject and that subject's environment is somewhat strange and paradoxical, and a very fertile soil for many different questions and opinions.
As one Estonian philosopher, Uku Masing, once said: there is no way of knowing whether one person's shade of yellow is that which another person sees. And that's something to think about: what's my RED? what's your red? what's a ladybird's red? Maybe, in my dreams, I could see your red and you could see mine, and we'd see "new" colours, or - different interpretations of the ones that already exists. Even if there are only "three main puzzle peaces" - so what. That doesn't automatically mean that we see those peaces from the same angle.
Interesting stuff, Sour Cherry Boy! And strange you mention that thing about 'another man's red' so-to-speak, because I used to hypothesize a similar concept when I was a kid. I thought, "what if one person sees red, but what he calls red I might call blue in my eyes?" As if the color wheel was rotated between individuals, red, blue, and yellow, switched up. How would we ever know? Of course, for this "another man's red" sort of concept to be true, the "color wheel" or color ratio would have to be basically consistent amongst everybody. So the wheel would either have to be rotated between individuals or there would have to be entirely different wheels.
Now, assuming what we're talking about is the latter version, the different wheels version, then the question is "could one man see another man's red in a dream?"... I don't know. I lean toward not though on an assumption that the ratio of colors is a law within and without every individual. If I were to somehow see your red it would have to replace mine. But I don't know.
|
|
Bookmarks