There are a few points of interest I have in discussing these recognized "universal" traits. I've been wondering for a while now what really qualifies as empathy and love. This includes on a biochemical/neurological level, emotional level, and a philosophical level. First I would like to address the matter of age, and how our emotions and feelings change on the same subjects.
When I was a young boy, my parents tell me that I was very empathetic. That is to say, according to them, I would be extremely considerate and caring for a child, and would often get emotional when I saw that others were emotionally hurt. Now, at the same time, I was a problem child because I would lose my temper very easily and resort naturally to violence. At my baby sitter's (which was more like a day-care) I would often get in trouble for hitting other children, and I also fought my own friends at several points throughout my childhood. So, despite these somewhat clashing personality traits, what I remember about myself back then generally reflects what I have been told. I felt sorry for people very easily and quite often, thinking things like "they didn't do anything to deserve having that happen to them". I also was known to talk to adults like I was an adult myself, several people made comments to my parents about it numerous times, even when I was very young. So, it makes sense that I would often have conversations with my parents about how they were feeling, and I actually put in an effort to be considerate. As far as feelings go, I felt like I had very intense emotions and reactions to just about everything I experienced. I was also terrified of practically everything that was even a little bit scary.
Flash forward to now, and I have very shallow emotions, if I have any at all. My reaction to fear is all but completely suppressed. When I see others experiencing misfortune or having trouble with their lives, I react to it in one of three ways: based on who they are, I find it incredibly funny, I feel nothing, or I feel like I should help them (but not "bad for them" like I heard people say so much). I don't find it as funny as I used to, this reaction doesn't happen often, and neither does the feeling that I should help them. I only feel like I should help them in the case that I really like the person or people, or someone is in very immediate danger (which to me proves more to be something I would do because I would want someone to help me, but also because I like being in dangerous situations--just about the only time I feel alive). Most often, I feel nothing, and the only reaction I can have to that is that maybe I should feel something, but that realization ultimately means as little to me as what I initially feel for whomever I'm observing.
Before I felt very justified in this, that I shouldn't have to feel that way for random people or for people I don't like. However, I very much dislike that attitude and find it annoying to know that is how I once felt, because I view people that are like that as subhuman. They are exactly what humanity doesn't need. Before I had zero shits to give about humanity, but I realized I became so detached from reality that my life was worse than pointless. I would rather kill myself than see the world that way anymore, and I have always vowed never to kill myself because I fail to see it as a valid decision to make (I'm gonna die, it's going to happen). So, with that, I decided to make a change in my behavior, and to make an actual effort to "care" about people's feelings and lives. In time, this is slowly becoming more of a habit of mine and much more natural.
However, my question to everyone here, primarily, is this: does what I exhibit qualify as empathy? And as an extension to that, is what I am about to describe able to qualify as love? I do not naturally feel sorry for anybody, I still don't. I do not "feel" any kind of emotion when I interact and observe people. All I can do is observe their reactions and use the same techniques I used to use to manipulate people in order to "emulate" empathy and love. I teach myself how to act in the ways I think an empath would act, and think the ways they would think. However, it is totally devoid of emotion, the roots to the plant are missing. When I was young, they were ingrained in my personality, they stemmed from the older parts of the brain, they came naturally. All I can do is literally put myself in their shoes (which doesn't work very well, but I realize it will never work that great as a technique, it is pretty easy to see how a normal person would react in a situation). If the end result is that someone would describe me as being empathetic, loving, and caring, knowing all that I have told you about the truth of the matter, am I actually capable of possessing empathy and feeling love? Are these qualities defined by their internal processes that lead up to their translation into behavior and actions, or are they only the end result? Why is your opinion on this valid, do you believe?
Now, getting past all that, here are a few musings about the subject. Is this change in personality I have had over the years a result of my world view changing? The more you experience in life, the more you learn about love and empathy, is it natural to begin dissociating from the emotional aspects of these qualities, or does your new understanding simply supplement the emotions you already feel from childhood? Something very interesting to note is that when I was about 15, I suffered from a traumatic brain injury (concussion), and then once again at 21. I am going to be 24 in two months. If you read up on TBIs/concussions, you will find that they can result in behavioral changes that reflect the behaviors of people that suffer from ADHD and even psychopaths/people with anti-social personality disorder. The ability to concentrate is diminished, you become more impulsive, you easily become bored, you crave constant stimulation, there are deficits in short-term memory, you may suffer from mood disorders or become depressed, there may be an increase in aggressive behaviors and tendencies (including resorting to violence), and one may become very irritable. In some cases, sufferers experience blunted affect (shallow emotions), take up drug abuse, are more likely to drink large quantities of alcohol, experience less anxiety in situations that would regularly cause it in others, and seem to lack remorse for their actions and any appreciable amount of empathy. Again, these are qualities that those diagnosed with AsPD/Psychopathy/Sociopathy and ADD/ADHD all possess to varying degrees. Now, a lot of all that matches up with my own personality, but given my tendency to get violent as a child (and my rather unofficial diagnosis of having ADHD by a few doctors I used to have as a kid), is my current set of personality traits really able to be pinned down to my head injuries? Admittedly, I think it is a mixture of both, one just exacerbated the other (although I do believe the TBIs had a major influence because I used to be so emotional and easily frightened).
Even if the head injury didn't cause all of my "issues", can you say that I am capable of empathy and love now? I admit that I have to train myself to really like somebody and care about their needs and feelings in a way that I feel is even remotely close to true empathy and love, but at the moment it's the best I can do. Love to me is more like an unhealthy obsession in which I supposedly put someone else above myself (but whether I consciously realize it or not, I am definitely doing it all for myself). Empathy is just a thought pattern, it is a trained reflex that I only trained myself to do because I didn't want to be like the people I despise most. I made an archetype in my head of what it is to be bad, and I what it is to be good, and I chose to be good. Can this be considered legitimate empathy, and legitimate love? What if somebody was capable of "true" empathy and love before becoming brain damaged or experiencing something very traumatic, and then after beginning to recover, teach themselves to be this way again, even if the "core" of those two qualities is gone? If the end result is the same, is there really a difference?
Personally I think there is, because I believe that the reason why somebody chooses to act a certain way is equally important to the results of those actions. No more, no less. If people all around the world had to fake empathy and love for us to be able to live peacefully and prosperously, it wouldn't bother me any (how do I even know it isn't already the case anyway?). However, these ideas have important criteria to meet, and I believe by the implications of the words alone, emotions are required to meet the definition. Do you agree? Why or why not?
Also, it's interesting to think that damage to the frontal lobes is what causes ADD and AsPD symptoms, yet emotions are handled more with other brain structures (it does include the frontal lobes, but in combination with others, like the amygdala), and children are capable of empathy and love (arguably--some don't seem to be, but just as many are, they will learn it at some point), and the frontal lobe is the last lobe to finish developing.
Of course, one could always argue that these traits are intangible and exist outside the mind, etc. I can't really expound on that line of thought because I don't think it's true, but I'd like to hear your opinions regardless (if you believe something similar) in the interest of discussion.
|
|
Bookmarks