You'll find that almost all of those are actually only true if you first assume that .999 is not 1. |
|
In case you haven't noticed, that post was edited... |
|
Well all of your other 'proofs' are wrong because you first have to assume that .999 is not 1 in order for them to work. Try it. |
|
If you took the time (IMPOSSIBILITY AHEAD!!!) to make a graph with every single decimal between 0 and 1 and the graphed y=.999~ and y=0, you would see that they are on different positions. Especially if you made the intervals big enough. Picture it. Please. |
|
y=1 you mean. |
|
There's no ambiguity at all about my question. |
|
lolwut? |
|
The density property is one way of proving .99... equals 1, and not a way of disproving it. |
|
|
|
He's referring to the fact that the reals are constructed from Cauchy sequences of rational numbers, and it's said that the reals are "dense in the rationals" because a real number can be found between every two distinct rational numbers. Ironically, the density of the reals forms the basis of the analysis-based proof that 0.9~ DOES equal 1: |
|
If only we had 6 fingers on each hand instead of 5, and had a mathematical system based on the number 12. |
|
Everything works out in the end, sometimes even badly.
|
|
I wish you'd terminate. |
|
|
|
Bookmarks