Originally Posted by Arutad
Does that imply certainty in English?
It's close to it yes.
Personally I think think that stealing is morally wrong in 99% of situations.
There are never any total black and white rules though.
However, someone elses relative need for the item (survival or otherwise)
isn't a good moral yardstick of if it is justifiable to take it from them.
A better yardstick would be the need of the person considering stealing in relation to the need of the owner.
For example a very poor man who is starving, stealing food from the owner of a shop, I would say, is more justifiable - than say, a poor man who i starving stealing from another poor starving man.
Another way to look at it is, is it ok to steal stolen good from a thief? (if you are not the original owner?)
But theft, can be many things. A rapist is a form of thief.
Is it ok for for a man who can never get sex, to rape a beautiful woman who can get it whenever she wishes?
I think the answer is obviously not, it is still a vile crime and utterly unjustified.
I think the simplest answer, regarding theft, is that you can never be sure of the impact your crime will have on the victim. A seemingly rich business mans entire business will rest on a point, where theft of items will push his business into impossible to sustain territory. You can never be sure if your crime will be the one that tips the balance.
What is interesting in this thread is that, considering the title is "what if you could get away with anything?", that people seem to default to doing things that are illegal, rather than considering the options for improving the world.
But i do think that it is easy to be moral when not faced with this "getting away with anything power". I myself would find it mighty tempting if i could walk into a bank and walk away with a million dollars, with no consequence.
The problem is it's all a matter of degree. If you can steal from a rich bank and justify it, it is only a matter of small subtle steps, until you can justify crimes that initially seem morally completely corrupt.
Perhaps the saying "absolute power, corrupts absolutely" is true after all?
Unfortunatly it seems that most humans define there actions on if they will cause a negative consequence for them. Rather than realising that all humans want to avoid negativity in life, and trying to avoid creating negativity in the world as a whole.
Stealing would create negativity for the victim.
They too are human, like ourselves.
Rather than focus on personal consequence, it is best to focus on the consequence of the world you live in.
Do we want to be creating a world in which people greedily mind their own interests? or a world in which people try and make each others lives better?
One path leads to a world of fighting, greed and paranoia,
the other leads to peace, kindness and trust.
A victim of theft, may in the future become cynical about other humans, and so less caring, and may eventually be pushed to commit crimes themselves... because they conclude that "it happened to me, so i have a right to do it myself"... and once that chain of thinking is created, eventually it'll come back to bite you in the arse.
Whilst i am not a fan of the word "karma", I do think if there is any such thing as Karma, it is the idea that your actions will create a wave of either positivity or negativity that will wash over the world you too inhabit.
Do you want to be drowned in waves of negativity to which you were party to creating? or do you wish to create waves of harmony, that make the world better for yourself and others?
That's my take on the situation.
|
|
Bookmarks