Thread: So...if you're SO sure that no "God" exists...

Originally Posted by Oneironaut

Damn, I completely left you hanging, Moonbeam.
Sorry. I completely understand what you're saying, though. Just wanted to let you know that.

Oh that's OK, O, we can call it quits now--we beat it to death anyway.

Originally Posted by Moonbeam

Oh that's OK, O, we can call it quits now--we beat it to death anyway.

Haha. True.

Originally Posted by Oneironaut Zero

...convince me!

(I may regret this, later on, but I've been drinking, and a FOXNews segment provoked me into having a little fun. )

This is not about the Judeo-Christian God, Buddha or Shiva. It is about disputing the idea of a creator, and what just might separate the atheists from the agnostics. Remember; if the only arguments you have against a God are ones against the God of any specific religion, you are not giving credence to atheism. You are simply presenting an argument against that particular religion. This is for a more objective debate about whether or not a creator possibly exists, and how well you're able to state your case. As an (albeit drunk, at the time of this OP) agnostic, I'll try to argue from a neutral position - one that does its best to present a rationale for the possibility of a creator, against opposition.

So, do your worst...

(Well...maybe not your worst. I'm only one man. Don't bury me with text. )

Buddha isn't a god.

I appreciate that.

That being said - please do not resurrect 3 year old, obviously dead, threads just to add something completely unnecessary.