Originally Posted by O'nus
I quoted an article in spite of you only quoting articles.
...what??
Originally Posted by O'nus
No, I said that you abandoned the other thread.
No, you banned me from the forums immediately afterwards.
Originally Posted by O'nus
You have no acknowledged my facts and you are still dodging them and defending yourself rather than acknowledging them.
Enough of this. I'm sick and tired of all the hours I spent on this forum being dismissed in such a ridiculous manner! I did INDEED respond to you, and a billion other people I can hardly even remember on multiple threads on multiple occasions on multiple matters. I ignored a ton of posts, mainly because of the problematic 20/1 ratio. I did not single you out, nor did I ignore you on every occasion. I responded to you as many times as I responded to anyone else. It doesn't help that you make such long winded posts that require a good forty-five minutes to respond to.
Originally Posted by O'nus
The universe has been proven to be older than 13 billion years old
Dude. I think I understand your definition of "proven". I think you mean, "Logically demonstrated through evidence." Nothing has been 100% proven, or disproven about the Evolutionary theory! Why can't you understand that??? Nothing is around that says "Made in 3,000,000,000 B.C" there is no human around who says "I remember the days when little fish began to sprout legs, and walk around on land!" There are falsifiable and shaky theories made to demonstrate how it could indeed be possible. It is plain immature to say "Evolution is a FACT, and it is 100% proven". It makes you biased and silly.
Originally Posted by O'nus
even you quoted an article saying that humans are 8 million years old.
Enough of that! You continuously evade the point of that article, which was to demonstrate that even Evolutionists realize the function of the appendix. It was to show that even people who believe that the universe has existed for 12 billion years, or whatever, understand the use of it.
Originally Posted by O'nus
You go ahead and find me the proven cause of gravity and I will retract my statement.
The cause of gravity is unknown, nor is the theoretical cause of your Evolution known either. All that is known is that gravity exists. Why? Because when I drop a ball, it falls. I am open to any theories as to why it works, and how, but Gravity is just terminology for a facet of physics. Evolution is a specific terminology for a theory on how the Universe came into existence.
Originally Posted by O'nus
I am not accusing, I am proving.
Oh, so you can PROVE that it was intentional?
Originally Posted by O'nus
Then why did you mention your age?
...because you asked me.
Originally Posted by O'nus
Oh, I see.
Originally Posted by O'nus
You yourself quoted an article that, firstly stated it is older than 8 million years old, and that it is a vestigial organ from our ancestors.
No, that was the article about the Appendix. I was not condoning that they said it was old, I was condoning that Evolutionists such as yourself realize that the Appendix has a use to it, whether or not you believe it evolved bears no relevance to the fact that it still has an important function.
Originally Posted by O'nus
Noogah, do you understand that evolution is proven?
Originally Posted by O'nus
Good luck - there are no holes in evolution as it is.
But I thought...
Originally Posted by O'nus
Yes, evolution can be disproven beyond a shadow of a doubt - I have already told you ways to do so. It is not my fault if you do not understand how.
Now your just confusing me.
Originally Posted by O'nus
Can you understand why creationists are ridiculed so much? It is because evolution has been proven and yet creationists still desperately try to squirm out of it and intellectually sham people..
No, there are many respectable individuals and scientists who spend large amounts of time studying, and demonstrating the fallacies of the theory. Intellectual shamming has no more part in it then does the intellectual shamming that Evolutionists do to Creationists. And they don't "squirm". It has been done many times easily.
Originally Posted by O'nus
If you find a thread to show holes in evolution, then you will win awards.
No, because, in your own words,
Originally Posted by O'nus
I did not prove it - others already did.
Of course, in my case, it would be, disprove it.
Besides that, nobody would give a flip anyways, and I would be shunned immediately. Don't act ignorant about it; you know very well that there has been a substantial amount of demonstration of Evolution's flaws. And guess what? I have a hunch that if religion had nothing to do with it, you couldn't care less.
Originally Posted by O'nus
but there is more proven facts about evolution than any other theory of the natural world.
...now that's just plain silly.
Originally Posted by O'nus
All dogs are related to the wolves.
Correct. Related, and that's all. The DNA of dog's and wolves are almost identical. They are relations; not different species. And since it's such a big Creation and Evolution shin dig, here's another article from Answers In Genesis on the topic. And, look. I don't know why these articles annoy you. They just elaborate on what I say in a more professional way, and they save me time. I've had my fair share of copy pastes from you too.
Originally Posted by O'nus
Plants do it on their own.
Sounds suspiciously like a function to me.
It's sometimes called a "horizontal gene transfer". Antibiotic resistant bacteria have been found in frozen bodies of humans who dies long before antibiotics. And, the bacteria who do gain this trait also have to suffer a defect in general functionality. Again, this is another common Creation/Evolution argument. We could go back and forth all day on it, and usually run around in circles. If you care, here is another Answers In Genesis article on the topic.
Yes, natural selection will occur at times. No, that does not prove Evolution.
Originally Posted by O'nus
However, I look forward to your sorry response that does nothing but defend yourself.
Good grief.
Originally Posted by Scatterbrain
A few facts:
- Species pass down their DNA to the progeny;
- Selective pressures exist in nature, resulting in the fittest being more likely to survive and pass their DNA;
- DNA mixes and mutates;
- Species continue on surviving and reproducing for thousands of years or more (life on Earth as a whole is at least billions of years old).
1.Rarely does a creature die thanks to mutation.
2.Never has a genetic mutation occurred that was known to make an animal work better -if anything, it dies, or suffered.
3.The age of the earth is still highly debatable.
Genetic mutations happen alot, but they rarely do anything. When they do, it's usually bad. A goat might be born with a human face...
So far, nature has not exhibited any sort of Evolutionary progress in animals.
That took me about an hour to write. I think I'm finished with this thread, O'nus. If you could perhaps crop your responses to a more doable length, I might continue correspondence, but this is just getting out of hand for me.
|
|
Bookmarks