Was there a reason for Photolysis to call LucidApprentice a moron?
Yes, there was a reason: I called him a moron because his statement was moronic, and I explained why. If I said something similarly stupid (though few statements are so profound as declaring the Theory of Evolution to be "idiotic"), I would actually be grateful that someone took the time to explain why I was being stupid. LucidApprentice's bold assertion based on what can only be described as staggering ignorance and arrogance deserves scorn. People like you who enable such people, by shielding them from the few who do say "you're wrong and you're being stupid, and this is why" are almost as bad.
Facts are not determined by popular opinion. Facts are not determined by what is "nice". Facts are not determined because people like or dislike them. Facts simply facts, and evidence helps us to determine what is a fact. If I started making statements about how the Earth was flat, and ignored all the evidence otherwise, it would indeed make me a moron. If I started praising science whilst simultaneously decrying the foolish scientists who think the Earth is round, it would make my position nonsensical. Someone would be entirely right to point these things out because they would be true.
I post in this forum to engage in discussion, to have my views challenged, and because I generally enjoy the topics that are found in here. I post in an extremely blunt way (to the point of rudeness when I feel it is necessary) because the world would be a much better place if people who said, did, and believed stupid things were told about it rather than the "live and let live" attitude of the enablers. This is because it gives such people a chance to learn from their errors, which benefits society as a whole when they take that opportunity.
If I do insult you, rather than politely explaining why you are wrong, or disagreeing then that is also for a reason. Either my reasoning is readily obvious (possibly because someone else has already explained) and hence I will not bother with an explanation myself, or I will explain why. Maybe it's because the magnitude of your stupidity is so great that such a reaction is deserved. Maybe it's because you ignored the same counter-point ten times in a row whilst insisting on claiming victory. Whatever the reason, there will be one, because it is utterly pointless of me to spend my time insulting people for no reason. Frankly, I have better things to do.
Yes, I care little for social norms, so what? If I say something foolish then someone else who is more knowledgeable is welcome to say "Photo, you're being stupid and need to educate yourself on this subject better". And I would look at it, and if they were right I would be grateful they took time out of their day to inform me so. I have no problem with being wrong, because if I know I'm wrong, I can fix it. If I know I'm being stupid, I can fix it. The only people who cannot handle being wrong are those with low self-esteem, which is ironically what you implicitly accuse me of with your amusingly incorrect attempt to psychoanalyse my motives.
If people have problems with others correctly pointing out facts, then they have severe issues. My points are valid and that's all that matters.
That's just a simple example of how we hate other people for being different
Again, another bad attempt at psycho-analysis. I don't hate anyone here. I actually pity the lack of intellect and knowledge a lot of people here display. It is especially sad when someone chooses this position willfully.
It is wise to learn to disagree and accept differences on subjective or meaningless things. What is not intelligent is to claim that opposing factual statements are equally valid. LucidApprentice's stance on Evolution is not "being different", it is just plain wrong.
|
|
Bookmarks