Thread: Cosmological redshift and inertial and gravitational equivalency explained

Invisible and visible space in fundamental equilibrium and balance is the middle distance in/of space in keeping with half gravity and half inertia. This is fundamental to visual experience and physics.


Inertial, electromagnetic, and gravitational equivalency and balancing clearly requires instantaneity and invisible and visible space in FUNDAMENTAL equilibrium and balance in conjunction with half inertia and half gravity and the MIDDLE distance in/of space. This is fundamental to physics, physical experience, and to unification in physics.

Now, what is the relation here with astronomical/TELESCOPIC observations and the cosmological redshift? How are these observations/visual experiences fundamentally possible? (Compare and contrast this with full gravity and full inertia.)

The cosmological redshift IS a gravitational redshift that involves increasing/more invisibility AND visibility of space (on balance).

A balance of inertia and gravity is necessarily and significantly involved with the cosmological redshift. The gravity and inertia are understood as increasing TOGETHER.

IMPORTANTLY, fundamentally equivalent and balanced gravity, electromagnetism, and inertia necessarily involves invisible and visible space in fundamental equilibrium and balance.

Also, consider how VISION (i.e. it is VISIBLE) begins INVISIBLY inside the eye/body.

Does the cosmological redshift involve increased invisibility and visibility of space? Yes.

Is a balance of inertia and gravity necessarily and significantly involved with the cosmological redshift? Yes.

Inertial and gravitational equivalency and balancing FUNDAMENTALLY involves visible and invisible space in equilibrium and balance.

IMPORTANTLY, fundamentally equivalent and balanced gravity and inertia necessarily involves BOTH at half strength force/energy. This is consistent with invisible and visible space in fundamental equilibrium and balance. (Compare and contrast this with the experience of full gravity and what is full inertia.) Consider how vision (i.e. it is VISIBLE) begins INVISIBLY inside the eye/body. There is no doubt that half gravity and half inertia is required for the fundamental/theoretical and ultimate unification and balancing of gravity, inertia, and electromagnetism. This ultimately proves F=ma.

Notice the increased "activity" of deep space telescopic observations with the connection that involves the relation of invisible and visible space.

Notice that vision is not even possible in the full/direct/real/actual experience of outer space, as outer space destroys and precludes us, our experience (including visual), and our thought. Accordingly, since we cannot actually/really experience outer space as it is, our understanding of outer space is significantly limited. Indeed, the ability of thought to describe or reconfigure sensory experience is ultimately dependent upon the extent to which thought is similar to sensory experience. Think about it.

by Frank DiMeglio
=========================
Inertial and gravitational equivalency and balancing fundamentally explained in our waking experience:

When waking and standing full gravity is full distance in/of space as it is seen, felt, and touched. Consider the visible Earth/ground. Now, the space above it involves visible and invisible space in fundamental equilibrium and balance. This is the middle distance in/of space, and it is half gravity and half inertia. Outer space is full inertia.

This is a huge, UNDENIABLE, and most fundamental breakthrough in physics.
by Frank DiMeglio
=========================
Inertial and gravitational equivalency and balancing fundamentally and ultimately explained in our dream experience:

Dreams involve fundamentally equivalent and balanced inertia, gravity, and electromagnetism (half gravity and half inertia) in keeping with what is the experience of the middle distance in/of space. Accordingly, dream experience involves visible and invisible space in fundamental equilibrium and balance.

In our waking and standing experience, full gravity is full distance in/of space as it is seen, felt, AND touched. VISIBLE space. JACKPOT !!!!
We are talking about a range of feeling/touch. Perfect !!!!

by Frank DiMeglio
===============================

We are talking about fundamentally stabilized distance in/of space. Full inertia, half gravity and half inertia, full gravity. Keep it simple folks. This is quite clear and complete the way I have explained it.

by Frank DiMeglio

Sir Isaac Newton was correct that inertia must be a property of space itself. The modern physicists admit that they cannot quite fundamentally and truly explain gravitational and inertial equivalency and balancing. This is already known and admitted to by the modern physicists.


NEWS DOESN'T GET ANY BIGGER THAN THIS, REALLY.
Comments and questions are welcome. Thanks. What is proven here is quite clear and simple. I am going to win the Nobel prize in physics.