So much talk about this thing called energy. Is it really anything more than matter is motion, and something that can be measured with an instrument?

When matter is destroyed is it not de-constructed into its parts, which includes the de-construction of its particles and sub-atomic particles, etc.

Do we really need the concept of energy to explain the Universe, if energy is de-constructing matter?

How can something exist and not be made of matter. Surely, the idea of anti-matter was taken from Star Trek.

The so called evidence for the existence of anti-matter is evidence for the impacting emission acting as pressure and causing particles to de-construct (explode).

Its not "energy" which binds matter into the elements and other higher forms of construction, but the attraction between the particles and sub-atomic particles which involves the absorption of emission which is made of matter.

Matter can be destroyed only in the sense that it;s reduced to its constitutent parts which are made of matter.

Matter is not one thing, because everything is made of matter.


paradigm