Thread: DV History

Originally Posted by Ynot

intellect is easily fake-able on the net
just like sex and age

If you mean by quoting and calling it your own work, then yes. But after a while people begin to notice :p.

I still want to know about this pedophile business.

www.pedophile.com heh...

Originally Posted by Half/Dreaming

I still want to know about this pedophile business.

thanks for the new sig

Originally Posted by Ynot

thanks for the new sig

You son of a bitch!!! You better sleep with one eye open

Originally Posted by Ynot

I once passed out in a pile of my own vomit.

This could become my sig. Btw, is it a major DV crime to alter quotes.

Originally Posted by Seeker

The Dreamviews domain was registered about 7 years ago by a gentleman named Icedawg...

Little is know about Icedawg aside from the fact that he was named after his great uncle, Cornelius Icedawg McCave, who was an internet gangster from Latvia in the early 1800's. Icedawg's primary exports include corn, forums and Diet Dr. Pepper. Icedawg, alumnus of CGNU, created the Dreamviews forum in the early 1800's shortly after graduation. The original framework of the forum was mostly made of oak and iron and powered by steam, a mule and a complex system of pulleys, and hasn't been changed much since then. It wasn't until fall of 2005 that anyone important would join. Eventually, Icedawg died in a boating accident and the rights to Dreamviews were bought by cash-mongering fiend "Asher", who sold both DV's, Icedawg's, and every member's soul just so that the forum could be spammed with ads. A great revolution to return to the days of olde formed, but Asher simply bought its leader's will power. The forum has since lost its direction and will continue to drift through space until it eventually crashes into a planet or star.

Originally Posted by Half/Dreaming

This could become my sig. Btw, is it a major DV crime to alter quotes.

Yes! *arrests half/dreaming*

*edited*
bugger
damn people jumping in before me and spoiling a joke

Originally Posted by Half/Dreaming

This could become my sig. Btw, is it a major DV crime to alter quotes.

Once Seeker altered one of my quotes. I thought that was really uncalled for.

Originally Posted by Mark75

Originally Posted by Seismosaur

This is how you make people say stuff

Huh, that's cool

Originally Posted by Mark75

*inserts generic insult to Seeker*

Ynot...damnit

Originally Posted by Mark75

WHAT DID I DO TO DESERVE THIS!?

Yea, guys, quit making him say stuff!

Originally Posted by Mark75

Fuck you, DV

Oh, dear, the vandals strike again! Poor me!

Originally Posted by Seismosaur

Mmmmm...tacos

I hope they are not from Taco Bell

Originally Posted by Mark75

Fuck me, DV

I dont see this ending well. Lets get back to DV history.

Originally Posted by ExoByte

I think just asking that question should be a bannable offense :p

Well it's not like were trying to hide anything from anybody, I mean serously everytime I see a thread where someone new asks about leo you guys have got it closed and unanswered in about an hour or so, everyone acts like it's a big secret, and the newbies arn't deserving enough to know it not talking only about you ExoByte but I see it in alot of people.

Plus everyone goes around with UNBAN LEO and KEEP LEO BANNED in their sigs, if I was a newbie I'd be pretty curous about leo

I think we should have a leo forum. Then we can just put every topic he has ever touched into it and be done with it =P

Then we auto-ban anyone who tries to browse it.. XD

Oh, and if staff was a reflection of lucid ability..... I might be on it.. now theres a scary thought XD

Originally Posted by Half/Dreaming

I still want to know about this pedophile business.

I can see that you are being ignored on that. See how in denial people are about Leo? He's got to be Charles Manson. About a year and a half ago, Leo started a thread about how society is hypocritical for saying some sex is good while some sex is bad. He said it is either all good or all bad. He made the point that pedophilia is not a problem for the victims until the victims, whom he does not consider victims, are told by society that there is something wrong with what they did. One of his major points was that the kids enjoy the sex and "got theirs early" but are screwed up mentally ONLY by therapy and society's reaction.

About ten months ago, Leo was spewing his usual hate at everybody on Earth who has religious views other than his very rare, very straight out of his ass views. He said that atheists have no morals or even a basis for morals. He was his usual jackass self about it. Since he was talking about my belief system, I started a thread about what he said about pedophilia a few months earlier. That sparked a major debate. He tried to cover his tracks by saying his point was that all sex is bad and society is hypocritical for recognizing that it is bad sometimes but not others, so I brought up his comments about "got theirs early" and how kids are okay with it until society says there's something wrong with it. But I pressed him so hard on the issue that he got really pissed and ended up saying kids often initiate pedophilia and that those victims are "sluts" and "perverts". He further went off about how supposedly kids enjoy being molested and that there is nothing any worse about pedophilia than consentual sex between adults. (And you would not believe the way some people jumped in and acted like they were his attorneys, doing their best to make it look like what he was saying wasn't so bad while I was out of line for calling him out on it.) He had very little to say about my point that kids end up severely screwed up after being molested even if they don't talk about it until adulthood. That thread ended up being so terrible that it was apparently deleted. I couldn't find it when somebody talked about this recently. You could probably find the first one in the Philosophy forum. The last post was made in about November or December of 2005. I don't want to be the one who initiates links to his sick posts here, so go hunt it down if you want to see it. A lot of people here read what he wrote.

I of course consider that he might have just been using a really sick sense of humor, which can be good in a lot of cases, but one way or the other, downplaying the seriousness of pedophilia and trying to pass yourself off as serious is very dangerous. There are plenty of pedophiles out there just waiting for the slightest excuse to go out do what will severely damage the lives of children 100% of the time.

MOTHER MARY!!! Now I understand all the controversy involved with this dude. I hope he was joking when he called pedophilia victims "sluts", because thats pretty screwed up. It sounds to me like he was supporting the rape of children.

Sounds like there's some major drama in DV's past. Thanks for the info on this, but still, I'm suprised I didnt hear about this until now.

I'm gonna have to hunt that thread down.

I agree with you Half/Dreaming, much drama!

Terribly interesting though.

Originally Posted by ExoByte

(Mes Tarrant fails to realize that Exo isn't really serious, and has thus ruined the gag. BOO!!!)



The amount of LDs one has had has nothing to do with being on the staff... I'm on the staff, and have been quite a while now because I was recognized as a mature, helpful, responsible member who is also knowledgeable in dreaming despite my actual ability to LD. You're ability to Lucid Dream has nothing to do with being on the staff. If that was the case a large percent of this forum would be staff, not to mention a large number of users who would not be responsible in the position.

Amen!

Originally Posted by Ynot

intellect is easily fake-able on the net
just like sex and age

I don't think so. If someone questions you on your views you need to be able to support them logicly. That isn't an easy think to do if you don't have a good understanding of what you are talking about.

[oh, and by the way, I'm having a little trouble with changing the colour of my posts. Any help?]

Originally Posted by Keeper

Amen!



I don't think so. If someone questions you on your views you need to be able to support them logicly. That isn't an easy think to do if you don't have a good understanding of what you are talking about.

[oh, and by the way, I'm having a little trouble with changing the colour of my posts. Any help?]

Why? Is "African American" font not good enough for you?

?

I'm not quite sure if I followed you correctly, but

a) I like the colour blue

b) Font? I didn't say anything about the font ...