I took an 'e' out of Species for you. |
|
Just feeling silly really. I have not started a regular thread for a little while. |
|
I took an 'e' out of Species for you. |
|
Don't forget their estranged half-sister, EILD |
|
My Lucid Dreaming Articles/Tutorials:
Mindfulness - An Alternative Approach to ADA
Intent in Lucid Dreaming; Break that Dry-Spell, Escape the Technique Rut
Always, no sometimes think it's me,
But you know I know when it's a dream
I think I know I mean a yes
But it's all wrong
That is I think I disagree
-John Lennon
But ultimately even EILD would fall into a DILD category as you have to notice the influence and react to it within the dream. |
|
Yeah it depends on the level of specificity you want to go to. Some would argue that DILDs can only be defined as resulting from stimuli from within the dream. |
|
My Lucid Dreaming Articles/Tutorials:
Mindfulness - An Alternative Approach to ADA
Intent in Lucid Dreaming; Break that Dry-Spell, Escape the Technique Rut
Always, no sometimes think it's me,
But you know I know when it's a dream
I think I know I mean a yes
But it's all wrong
That is I think I disagree
-John Lennon
I honestly don't care for the acronyms. They're a simple way to categorize things but everyone seems to want to cash-in on them like creating a new term will win them money. |
|
That's why I posted the thread. The concept of WILD and DILD cover it all. We need a special catagory for the WILD and I support that. But it is enough. I can even accept DEILD going in with WILD, but then the title of the thread would not be so funny. |
|
Last edited by Sivason; 06-26-2012 at 11:57 PM.
Bookmarks