I haven't been active much on the DreamViews forum for a couple years now. This is mainly because I never was able to find a lucid-dream induction approach that worked for me, while also not disrupting my sleep. So while I could tolerate the sleep degradation for a while and get pretty good results (check my profile for the threads I started for several techniques/ideas), I'd eventually always stop the trial, because my sleep was impacted too much for me to continue it indefinitely.
Well, I'm still very interested in finding an induction approach that works well, while being sustainable. This evening I spent some time trying to think of new possibilities.
This is my current idea:
* In order to avoid impact on my sleep, the technique (contrary to most of my prior experiments) should try to focus on daytime training.
* As a software engineer, and someone who has recently gained an interest in DIY electronics projects, I'd like to use something like an Arduino or Raspberry Pi as part of the project.
* Device: The plan is to create a small device, with an Arduino as its micro-controller (probably an Arduino Nano 33 BLE), a rechargeable battery, and a vibration motor, all packaged together into a 3d-printed enclosure for component protection -- and with a set of physical buttons for interaction without needing to pick it up / look at a screen. (this, and battery life, is the main reason I'm avoiding the easier route of just using a second smartphone)
* Placement: Get several pairs of pants/shorts with a side-pocket that will fit the device nicely, so I can have it on me always without attracting too much attention.
So what will the device actually do?
1) The device will continually monitor the "direction" that my body is facing. Thankfully, magnetometers are very precise nowadays (as I've confirmed with my phone), so this step is not a problem. (in contrast, GPS is not quite consistent/precise enough here)
2) Whenever there's a "change in my direction", the device will add that delta to a tracked value, of how much I have changed directions since the value's last reset.
3) Once the "direction-change accumulator" exceeds a certain threshold, the device will start to gently vibrate; the strength will increase the more it exceeds this threshold.
4) Whenever it is in this "vibrate state", I can reset the accumulator-value by correctly inputting the direction (N, NE, E, SE, S, SW, W, NW) that I am facing, using a set of 8 buttons on its side. (the device will likely have some tolerance for inaccuracy of my guessed facing-direction)
5) While theoretically I could just "press all 8 direction buttons" whenever it starts vibrating (to reset the accumulator-value), I will try very hard to avoid this, so that I can start building up a mental map of how each building/location I visit is situated in global space.
Now why do I think that this scheme could be helpful for inducing lucid dreams? Well:
* First off, I recognize it shares some similarities with "interval-based, reality-check prompts" on phones. One big advantage here though, is that this approach doesn't trigger when the user is merely sitting somewhere for long periods, working or eating or the like -- which lets the user keep it on more consistently without fatigue/abandonment.
* It also trains the user to pre-emptively associate "I'm moving [or about to move] to another location" (which is one of the few things that happens all the time in dreams!) with the thought-process, "Oh hey, I need to think about what my location/direction is globally." -- rather than merely reacting to a prompt initiated by one's phone. In other words, I suspect the tracking process to integrate more thoroughly into a person's core thought processes, due to it being something they can anticipate based on the actions they're about to perform, rather than just a "rote reaction" they develop.
* By having the device on me at virtually all times, I am hoping that the mental processes I associate with movement (eg. "When I'm in our living room, this wall faces north, this wall faces west", etc.) become something that transfers into my dream as well.
* If it does transfer into my dreams, I suspect that this "prompting of location-related memory access" will have the side-effect of leading to improved access of other memories as well. (eg. like how thinking about "what did I do yesterday?" in a dream can trigger other memories from the outside world)
* I also suspect that, by forcing me to interact with the device at my side to stop the buzzing, it will act as a sort of "passive reality check" -- since technology very often does not work correctly in dreams. (and I can do a more reliable check like the nose-plug/breathing check whenever I notice something odd with it)
* Through integration of this "passive reality check", and thinking about my global position/direction, I'm hoping to achieve some of the mindfulness habits involved in techniques such as ADA and @Hukif's Gravity RC technique.
So will it work? If my past experiments (long-term) are a guide, then probably not! But I still want to try it, as I've never tried a technique like it before (ie. one that focuses on daytime training, and avoids sleep disruption), and vaguely-similar techniques like all-day-awareness have given strong results for a select few.
The problem with all-day-awareness for me (and Hukif's Gravity RC), is that they don't have a way to "keep the person compliant". Basically: as the trainee's motivation wanes, there does not seem to be a "clear boundary" between compliance and non-compliance. I see this as a problem, because it means that someone can "start cheating" without having to admit to themselves that they are cheating. In other words, they can just "slowly slide" into increasing non-compliance, until they get to a point where they realize they aren't even following the technique anymore, and they give up.
In contrast, the approach outlined above has the benefit of having compliance enforced by the device; the device will track your direction changes for you, and prompt you with vibrations until you "check in" with the device again. Granted, there is still the "loophole" of the person just pressing all 8 buttons and avoiding the need to think about anything, but this can be avoided in various ways if it becomes a problem. (One idea would be to have a button they can press to say "stop vibrating for a minute so I can think", allowing them time to think about their direction, or get out their phone to check, if it's a new location. They can then input their answer, and if they're wrong, the device will not let them input a new answer until 30 seconds pass or something -- thus making "lazy/cheat inputs" more painful than just finding/remembering the actual answer.)
Anyway, if anyone else has tried an idea like this before, please let me know so I can learn from your/their experience! Also, please don't hesitate to share any thoughts you have on it, including critical ones; I already accept that my experiment has a <50% chance of success, so criticisms are not a problem. If it doesn't work out, I'll still have gained a lot in terms of Arduino development experience.
And with that, I'll resume my research (at the moment, looking through options for the device's vibration motor and battery-pack). I plan to post in this thread from time to time, to give updates on my progress.
|
|
Bookmarks