Thread: Finally, A 10 second lucid induction! Title -*MFG*

spaceexplorer has some very good points.

I think Arby, here at DV did a fantastic tutorial like this a while ago, I should look it up.
Think it was a VILD.

There seems to be a large component of people seeking credit and using these posts as a Ego Competition.
It should be to share your experiences to help others or to ask for help if needed, for eg.

These links I never saw, but could explain the popularity of this thread.
I do like the technique, but think it was a bit rushed in its composing.
The challenge to do better and such leads me also to think it is set as a competition, and that is where real crap starts being posted and rushed and truths stretched.

Maybe why we had these ...ILDs come through so fast with rediculous titles.

I am usually fairly balanced in my responses, but I more agree with spaceexplorer so far on this one. (Although the old base technique still holds true).
The picking up on the timeframe was on the border of petty though.
I have on numerous occasions disagreed with him, as I love logical debating, but not childish banter.

BTW by debating this and responding, we are supporting this post and making it bigger - a paradox in itself (no pun intended).