Im not a lucid dreamer and don't want to be. But I love share dreaming. |
|
For those interested send a pm with details about yourself and your experience toward lucid and shared dreaming |
|
Last edited by test1; 05-08-2019 at 01:18 PM.
Im not a lucid dreamer and don't want to be. But I love share dreaming. |
|
EbbTide000's Signature.
My original username was debraJane, later I became Havago. Click link below!
What are Your Thoughts on This?
***
http://www.dreamviews.com/beyond-dre...houghts-2.html
^^ That's a good point. |
|
I’m not planning on applying to this, but I am curious about something. This thread’s title says that the shared dreaming group is official—but there’s no mention of an organization that it’s affiliated with. If I were considering applying, this is something I’d want to know up front—especially since not including it makes the whole thing look rather fishy in a way that just saying, 'hey, want to get a shared dreaming group together?' doesn't. I'd also want to know the premises you would be operating on. There are many different ideas about shared dreaming floating around, and you’re likely to run into difficulties if it turns out your volunteers aren’t on the same page as you. |
|
Thanks for all of your applications so far, |
|
^^ And again: in my experience, telepathy in the dream state really does not require lucidity; in fact, I would guess that most dream-sharing events (should they occur at all) would happen during non-lucid events. Why the focus on lucidity? Seems like an unnecessary complication... |
|
If you are not lucid, how you are gonna know what to do. Isn't this similar to the task of the month. In non lucid state you are just gonna passively think that you are talking with real person, but in reality you are just talking to yourself. Of course, If a lucid dreamer invade your dreamscape and make you lucid, this is a totally another story.^^ |
|
Last edited by GordanFreeman; 05-13-2019 at 11:21 PM.
Well, the OP still hasn’t addressed my concerns—which would have taken all of two seconds for someone with nothing to hide—and so I have to say: yes, this whole thing is decidedly fishy. Signing up for this will mean accepting the authority of an individual who is misrepresenting themself—possibly because they’re trying to take advantage of people’s credulity in some material way or—just possibly—because they have a rather inflated idea of themself and would prefer dictating the terms of an experiment to working them out with other interested dreamers on equal terms. This ought to be a matter of concern for anyone who believes it’s possible to share dreams since they would, essentially, be inviting this person in. Just saying. |
|
Why not identify yourself (test1? seriously?) before requesting everyone's personal information? Organization? Location? Salary? Anything to prove your not some cult leader. |
|
Last edited by PrisonPlanet; 05-14-2019 at 05:20 AM.
we would rather not discuss in public the details of those organising this experiment, but all information will be given (about us) once the selection process has been completed. There is no payment involved. No personal information is asked apart from the timezone the applicant resides in. The point of the experiment is to measure and prove the existence of ESP related phenomena within the dream state through transference of information between 2 or more individuals who of which are lucid within the dream state. A high lucidity and recall rate is vitally important from all applicants |
|
NOTE TO SELF: Get lucid in a dream, request details on organizer of shared dreaming research group, and memorize same! |
|
So ... is this the real universe, or is it just a preliminary study?
This shows the experiment is being done with a confirmation bias, which is the tendency to place more emphasis on evidence that confirms existing beliefs than evidence that does not. This can lead to errors in reasoning due to not taking all of the evidence into consideration. |
|
Test1, if anyone could achieve telepathy, telekinesis, remote viewing, (at will) it would probably be more valuable than military intelligence. Thats why the scientific american (along with houdini) offered 5000$ in the 1920's (thats almost 70k today) to anyone who could produce evidence of psychic phenomena. You basically want the same thing..except no one knows who the fuck you are. |
|
Last edited by PrisonPlanet; 05-14-2019 at 09:27 PM.
If I was going to do any kind of research on this subject, I wouldn't conduct it online. That way, I would have more to work with. |
|
Earn your wings! Try out Dream Views' Tasks of the Month and Tasks of the Year today!
Here: https://www.dreamviews.com/tasks-month-year/
With Dreaming you need to start small and work hard grow your lucid dreaming lifestyle...
I'm not just a lucid dream, I'm a Somnonauts!!
“It’s... your conscience. We don’t talk a lot these days.”
Am I late for the the shared dreaming research group application? It sounds like a rare opportunity, with mobs of lucid dreamers applying and only the most accomplished and elite getting in. Am I good enough, do I measure up? |
|
Agreed. However, I'm still skeptical about test1. What's the purpose of experiment? Anyway, I think it's possible houdini was genuinely concerned to find something but you are correct. Rules,/regulations were bad. It's been a while since I read (the witch of lime street..not great but has details) If I recall correctly some of the claims were ridiculous (things dealing with 'ectoplasm' expelling from body). Last, i saw Tool when I was 17 (waterloo nj) with fishbone, primus. Great show. I took home a custom 'fishstick' from fishbone drummer, will definitely check out album. |
|
Yeah, shadowofwind, you are way late. |
|
Last edited by Lang; 09-13-2019 at 03:12 AM.
Looking at the mob mentality that animates twitter, as an example, I think that people have all the group-think they can handle right now. If the kind of emotional telepathy involved in shared dreaming were proved, an upside is that people would be more aware of what they're already subject to, which can make it easier to avoid being manipulated by it. On the downside, an even larger number of people would be freaking out about their newly recognized vulnerability, or trying harder to subvert it for some kind of advantage. |
|
Bookmarks