Originally posted by Tsen
Here's the problem: I don't respect your religion.
It's based on paranoia and cotton balls, from what you've posted of it.
Besides, check my custom title. See the whole \"Faithbuster!\" thing? Yeah. Not a big friend of Theology here.
The fact is, I've got you beat. I guaruntee I know more about quantum physics than you do. Wouldn't be hard, since apparently you know about nil.
The scientist who did that \"water crystal\" experiment didn't isolate the water. The \"crystal\" formed when around heavy metal music is nothing more than a water ripple. A water ripple caused by the water's exposure to sound waves, in fact. And if the water wasn't isolated from outside influence, you can't really make much of the rest of his research, can you?
Also, you still haven't really commented on the Florence Island bit. You claimed earlier that they were, and I quote: \"They are just smaller humans with larger brains capable of magic.\"
The midgets on Florence Island had SMALLER brains. 1/3 the size of ours. In addition, their evolution suggests that they were incapable of intercontintental travel. Further, they used STONE tools. Very crude. If they could extract metal from the earth with their minds, I'd think they'd use it.
3114 BC IS the time Mayans predicted as the beginning of the world. That's a straight up fact. Not open for interpretation, including your bit that they just predicted the start of their society. And they were wrong. As we know, civilization STARTED long before that.
I don't believe that we're only a few thousand years old. But I DO believe that we evolved from one source, seeing as how two separate species CAN'T breed, therefore CAN'T evolve. You're still going to have to show me evidence for your new evolutionary theory.
Meaningless. Seriously. The word \"Tau\" may be in all the languages (I'm not sure on all of them, just a few), but it doesn't mean the same thing in every one. Likely coincidence, especially considering that \"Tau\" is a one-syllable word, increasing the chances of it appearing in many languages exponentially.
You didn't leave the blog address, so I can't verify it using your source. But again, incorrect. One, no evidence of a world-spanning civilization has been found. In fact, evidence points towards the OPPOSITE. All information gathered from ancient civilizations points towards low mobility. Don't go saying that the evidence was just destroyed and rewritten, because that's just a cheap ticket out and you know it. Show us HOW and WHY the evidence was destroyed.
Still, evidence suggest incredibly low mobility until relatively recent times. In fact, one of your other statements furthers this. The \"Hobbit\" skeletons found were that of a branch of the human evolution chain that, after being isolated on a very small landmass for an extended amount of time, evolved to be smaller. This sort of evolution happens often times when a species is confined to a small space for many generations. It's happened on other islands as well, this just furthers this. A civilization with infinite mobility and technological advances, especially one with \"mind-powers\" should be capable of intercontinental travel, but the evolution of these skeletons suggests THE OPPOSITE; that the branch of the human race isolated on that island was IMMOBILE and incapable of leaving the island. Now, evolution is a pretty set-in-stone theory in this regard. It's got plenty of backing evidence. Do you have any evidence for your \"theory\" of evolution (from many animorphic beings)?
The Mayans based their 2012 prediction off of two calendars: A religious calendar with NO basis in the physical world, and an astrological calendar based on the movement of the moon and earth. The last time the years began on the same day, they said the world began. No backing evidence there. Hell, you'd have to admit that it's VERY wrong, seeing as how it puts the world's birth at 3114 BC. That's WAY off, even according to your theory.
Not possible, even with your demented idea of quantum physics. Energy generation can't occur through merely thinking about it, no matter how advanced your mind is. Extracting metal from the ground is possible, but unlikely. And it wouldn't fall under the category of \"things you can control via thought\" either.
Both right and wrong here. Yes, we had theorized about smaller humans. But we certainly hadn't theorized that they had mind powers. And you're still caught with your pants down on that one--where's your backing? I'd like evidence if you expect to convice me that people arrived at the conclusion that midgets with telekenisis were running about a few thousand years ago, and all without breaching logical laws. Also, the theory WAS proven last year. But not the mind-powers part. And it falls under my evolution statement above, which voids your statement that they were a globe-spanning civilization. Especially seeing as how as far as we can tell the \"hobbits\" were anything but advanced technology wise.
I'd like to see some backing for this statement. Evolution's got it's backing. For the second time today, I'd like to suggest the book \"The Origin of Species\" by Charles Darwin.
Evolving from many races would imply breeding of two unlike species. That is, species that don't even vaguely resemble eachother. IE, try and get a cat and a dog to mate. It won't work. And that's mild compared to what you're suggesting. Cats and dogs are at least both mammals. You're implying something far beyond that.
Like I said earlier, religion and science are VERY different. Magic doesn't even enter the picture.
Not so. Leastwise, we haven't found any evidence to suggest things being that way. We've never dug up a civilization's remains that's been more advanced than we are. Sorry.
Black holes don't destroy matter. They're gravitational singularities, and you can bet that it'd kill a human if they happened to somehow get pulled into one, but it wouldn't destroy the matter the person was made of. Eventually, if all the matter is sucked into black holes, the black holes will begin to suck up eachother, and we'll reach one huge singularity, (Big Crunch) which would then re-expand into a new universe (New Big Bang). The black holes never destroy anything, they only destroy it as we know it.
You like making bold and unbacked statements, don't you? The things you've said are ANYTHING but proven. Hell, they're self-contradictory.
That's nice. Thanks for assuming that everybody else on the forum are uneducated nimrods. Been there, done that. I've studied it, and I find the apocalyptical theories lacking.
Creepy how much you sound like Nirvana Starseed there. \"One-ness\" and all that. Honestly, I've given him what-for on it, and he's never been able to back his claims. Back your claims, please. If you want to see my backup for my atheist standpoint, see the Religion forum. You'll have to join the Religious Discussion team to get into it though. Just click the \"Teams\" icon at the top of the site and find the Religious Discussion team, click join and go to the forum. Isn't hard to find my stuff there.
Seems to me my Grandpa came through it okay. The dust bowl wasn't anything amazing. Yeah, it was nasty. It made a lot of people hungry. We probably wouldn't be fully prepared if it happened again, but we wouldn't die off by the billions, either. The Dust Bowl was a completely natural and unremarkable event. It proves nothing, other than that the US wasn't prepared for a famine at the time.
Dreams are hardly evidence. I've had dreams that my rabbit gnawed off my leg and started ripping people's throats out. Looked like something out of a Monty Python movie. But that doesn't mean it will happen.
|
|
Bookmarks