Originally posted by Gawain+--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Gawain)</div>
Telekinesis is dealing with moving physical objects with another physical object at a distance. Physical things are bound to physical laws, and thus needs to be explained scientifically. [/b]
It’s being researched scientifically by many different factions.
I’m taking your referring to “physical things” with any sort of absolution means you’re not familiar with the scientific concept of wave/particle duality? Or the non-locality of electrons that seem to “teleport” from one area of orbit to another?
I’m not sure why you’d let your lack of information on something dictate to you that it doesn’t exist. Couple that with what seems to be your decision to take what you hear about on your world news and text books to be the end of the universe, and I’d say you’re well on your way to having to be spoon-fed through life.
[Edit: I do agree that it is nothing spiritual, though, if it does exist. You’re right about that one....(depending on how you interpret spiritual, of course)]
<!--QuoteBegin-Marvo
The human body and brain is a biological function, not a magic hat. *
To lift something, we need a force that can lift the object. This force is apparently not vissible to the human eye, and it is not in contact with our body. Apparently you can control this force, to leviate objects, if you train your brain hard enough. *
And yes, we humans have many times been mistaken on how the Universe functioned, but lately we've dropped all the religion brawl, and now we're going by the scientific ways. We've got a lots of documentation for what we've discovered, and the documentation we see these days, is way more relieable, because we are not influenced by some powergreedy people in the *cough* Vaticane state *cough* *
And again, if such a powerfull force as telekenisis has excisted for almost allways, how come we haven't got more confirmation, documentation, prove, evidence, eyewitness, than we've got? *
I am a very skeptic person when it comes to supernatural subjects, I know that, but hello, all the stuff we discover and find out is getting confirmed for real. I base much of my knowledge on my own logic sense and what I read. And I base my knowledge on relieable sources. What I find relieable after all. Let me point out, that TK might be possible, and it'd be great if it was, but compared on how stuff is looking right now, my is standpoint non-believer. *
Correction. (as Peregrinus explained) You are what we call a “pseudo-skeptic,” a person who uses the disguise of actual skepticism to exercise a faith-based disbelief in any certain subject, even when presented with evidence that contradicts your belief.
You have no interest in finding out just how little about the “scientific ways” that you’re talking about, because you believe that any evidence that contradicts your obviously limited understanding of those scientific ways is automatically false. This gives you a reason to ignore any that’s presented to you.
Being “skeptical” doesn’t mean you disbelieve something. Being “skeptical” means you haven’t seen enough information to convince you of something, but are open to information of the kind, if you can find it, and are given reason to believe it’s credible. I think you should really find a better word for you “close-minded disbelief,” than “skepticism.”
Your only argument (throwing aside all of your rhetoric about our “scientific ways” that is basically Wrong) is that you don’t believe TK exists because you make the assumption that if anything exists, it would be plastered all over the news paper and TV. Wrong again, but since this is the basis for your argument, own up to it, and don’t misquote science as your ally.
You ask why we haven’t had more confirmation, documentation, proof, evidence and eyewitnesses than we’ve got? We do. What are you talking about? Oh, you mean why haven’t you been told? Easy, because some things in life you just have to research yourself. (or listen to people that have done it, and can actually give you information. I was about 22 when I started discovering that fact, so maybe you’ll realize it a bit more over time.)
Stanford, Princeton, the CIA (you do know who they are, right?), the Society for Psychical Research, etc. These are all huge organizations (and are way above the league of your “few 17 year olds on the internet”) that have well-documented EFECTS with parapsychology. These documents don’t just disappear over time. They are all over the place for you to read them. After something is documented it takes another set of very-powerful eyes to edit the documents and decide whether they are suitable to be published and given out to the masses. Most people have been reluctant to do that with parapsychology though, because the effects, so far, are small and unstable.
These are facts printed in the documents, and even those from the CIA suggest parapsychology have as basis in truth, just nothing that is as of use to their programs.
And basically what you’re telling me is that your faith-based lack of information that you call “logic sense,” is superior to the facts printed about the greater-than-chance results of evidence for PK that all of these institutions have documented? Sorry, but that’s against my ”logic sense.”
|
|
Bookmarks