Thread: Remote Viewing Experiment

Originally Posted by drewmandan

Blah blah blah blah blah...

(Sorry!)

That was just the first attempt, just wait till we get some more participation. Not everyone is going to be good at it, I'm not at all. Just wait until we find a couple of people who are.

It's not supposed to be 100% accurate either, but some people give tons of accurate detail that makes chance seem very unlikely.

Hope nobody can guess whats under my bed!!! lol

Originally Posted by The Cusp

(Sorry!)

That was just the first attempt, just wait till we get some more participation. Not everyone is going to be good at it, I'm not at all. Just wait until we find a couple of people who are.

It's not supposed to be 100% accurate either, but some people give tons of accurate detail that makes chance seem very unlikely.

You don't seem to understand -- the way this experiment is set up is fundamentally unscientific. So go ahead and preach to the choir, but you're not going to convince anyone with a brain of this stuff.

Originally Posted by drewmandan

You don't seem to understand -- the way this experiment is set up is fundamentally unscientific. So go ahead and preach to the choir, but you're not going to convince anyone with a brain of this stuff.

lighten up man, its just a bit of fun.

Originally Posted by drewmandan

You don't seem to understand -- the way this experiment is set up is fundamentally unscientific. So go ahead and preach to the choir, but you're not going to convince anyone with a brain of this stuff.

I never intended this to be scientific, and why should I? These types of experiments have been done under far more stringent conditions than the internet will allow, by far more qualified people. The results of those tests indicate there is something going on, but they didn't settle anything. I'm not fooling myself into thinking these experiments will change the way anyone thinks, I'm just doing this to satisfy my own personal curiosity.

I am hoping to refine the methods and controls as this progresses, but imposing strict controls on an internet experiment is pointless. It would always be too easy to cheat, and could never be considerrd conclusive, so it's just not worth the effort.

Originally Posted by The Cusp

I never intended this to be scientific, and why should I? These types of experiments have been done under far more stringent conditions than the internet will allow, by far more qualified people. The results of those tests indicate there is something going on, but they didn't settle anything.

Please provide a link to one peer-reviewed paper that says there's something going on.

Originally Posted by drewmandan

Please provide a link to one peer-reviewed paper that says there's something going on.

Will you just go away. Any respected scientist who lends his name to something of that nature gets ostracized by the community. Nobody is willing to risk their career on something like that. And any "peers" in a field of study like that wouldn't be taken seriously to begin with, so what you're asking is an impossibility.

i cant see a thing now when i try to see the new object, not a single detail, should i learn remote prescence instead and see if that works better? or should i read up more on RV because i havent looked right into it that much

Could you repost the picture of your first object? It isn't working for me.