Thread: 7 Charged as F.B.I. Closes a Top File-Sharing Site

People can still pay for movies they want to own. Film Studios can adapt by releasing special collector's DVDs or making their films in 3D to motivate people to see it in theaters. There's so many movies out, people simply can't afford to pay to see every single film that looks good, but the ones that are worth owning will still make money.

Blame our consumerist culture for flooding us with so much crap we can't pay for it all so we watch/listen illegally in order to find the gems.

As I think was mentioned, Valve CEO Gabe Newell said, that the only way to stop piracy is to offer a better product.
Which is what extras on DVDs and special editions etc. are for.
They could also make it cheaper, coz they're way overpriced.

The analogy made wasn't exactly the same Xei, but the point is the same. They have to adapt to new technologies or die.
It's as simple as that.

Originally Posted by cmind

Why hasn't Hollywood implemented an iTunes-like system for movie distribution? Perhaps they thought it would be cheaper to just lobby the government, huh?

iTunes sells movies.

As long as this baseless pro-piracy attitude continues to be so widespread, all you're doing is allowing personal greed to give our government all the justification it needs to violate your rights.

Originally Posted by Supernova

iTunes sells movies.

Yes but the movie companies didn't set that up did they?

Originally Posted by Supernova

As long as this baseless pro-piracy attitude continues to be so widespread, all you're doing is allowing personal greed to give our government all the justification it needs to violate your rights.

....Right.... just ignore all our points and call our pro-piracy attitude "baseless".
Nice tactic.

I don't understand what pro-piracy attitude you're talking about, anyways. Sure, a fraction of people pirate shit but most people I know who used to pirate movies have switched over to using Netflix and only pirate movies they can't find there. There's also a process people go through involving Pandora and other websites that enables them to explore and purchase music. I don't know very many who can afford music/movies but pirate them anyways. I know some friends who pirate games but they still buy plenty of games, too. Piracy is caused by an unwillingness for companies to adapt to changing circumstances and an unwillingness to let people try before they buy even though that's practically the only way to get what you want if you're not filthy rich.

Trying before you buy allows you to pick through all the crap, that doesn't mean when you find the good shit you don't buy it. I doubt any of these gaming/film/music companies have lost any real profit due to piracy. On the contrary, it's enabling them to market their shit easier. Looking at websites that adhere to copyright laws (like Pandora or 8tracks), they're okay but they're far too limiting to be helpful. It strikes me as insane that these are considered the only justifiable ways to explore new music.

Originally Posted by tommo

As I think was mentioned, Valve CEO Gabe Newell said, that the only way to stop piracy is to offer a better product.

Although I attend the screening of these films at the cinema and purchased Jackson's extended-edition DVD collection, I must admit I torrented the trilogy's soundtrack.

d24w6bsrhbeh9d.cloudfront.net/photo/1978518_700b.jpg (Unfortunately, I still cannot post images.)

Originally Posted by tommo

As I think was mentioned, Valve CEO Gabe Newell said, that the only way to stop piracy is to offer a better product.
Which is what extras on DVDs and special editions etc. are for.

What Gabe said is that the only thing you can do is offer a superior service. For video games, Steam is currently that service. Pirating games is simply a pain. Steam on the other hand is very easy to use, has a bunch of other features, and it also updates all of your games by itself. There isn't really an alternative yet.

With respect to movies on the other hand, like I said, it's fast approaching a point where the cimenatic experience versus the pirate experience is indistinguishable. If you stop and actually exercise some self-criticality for just two seconds, your entire idea doesn't even make any coherent sense: pirates can just as easily distribute the extra content and extended editions of films for free. There's no difference at all in the situations, and exactly the same problem.

They have to adapt to new technologies or die.
It's as simple as that.

Piracy isn't a fundamentally new technology, and in no sane sense at all does it 'replace' the film industry; it's just getting better and far easier. You've so far failed to answer the central question: how can films possibly even be made when the new 'technology' takes those films and gives them out virtually for free?

Even with Steam, there are still games released on there that are so badly structured, when it comes to the installation and DRM process, you're better off pirating them. There's one game I still can't play, because it has double DRM (Steam and SecuROM). It just refuses to work. I guess I could contact support, but I don't really care.

Originally Posted by Xei

What Gabe said is that the only thing you can do is offer a superior service.

OMFG!!!!!!!1111!!!11oneoneone. I didn't choose the exact word he said OH NOES!!!!

Originally Posted by Xei

With respect to movies on the other hand, like I said, it's fast approaching a point where the cimenatic experience versus the pirate experience is indistinguishable. If you stop and actually exercise some self-criticality for just two seconds, your entire idea doesn't even make any coherent sense: pirates can just as easily distribute the extra content and extended editions of films for free. There's no difference at all in the situations, and exactly the same problem.


Piracy isn't a fundamentally new technology, and in no sane sense at all does it 'replace' the film industry; it's just getting better and far easier. You've so far failed to answer the central question: how can films possibly even be made when the new 'technology' takes those films and gives them out virtually for free?

ok, nobody uploads special editions. Go try to find one, they're not there.
Secondly I'm saying pirates don't choose one or the other, they either weren't going to buy it anyway or they pirate it and buy it later. Otherwise the companies would not exist right now. SO if yOu even read this exact argument I made before you would know that I think that question is invalid.

Originally Posted by tommo

OMFG!!!!!!!1111!!!11oneoneone. I didn't choose the exact word he said OH NOES!!!!

No you dolt, you used one which meant something completely different. Steam is not the same thing as the stuff you purchase via Steam, unless you're doing it very wrong.

ok, nobody uploads special editions. Go try to find one, they're not there.

Lord of the Rings Extended Edition Boxset... check.
Blade Runner Final Cut... check.
Harry Potter DVD with extras... check.
Okay, I'm bored of this now. I ask you to exercise self-criticality and you apparently don't even bother to Google for the thing you just told me to Google.

Secondly I'm saying pirates don't choose one or the other, they either weren't going to buy it anyway or they pirate it and buy it later. Otherwise the companies would not exist right now. SO if yOu even read this exact argument I made before you would know that I think that question is invalid.

What companies? Film companies exist right now because cinemas are superior to monitors and downloading can be slow, fussy, and lower quality. I've already said all this, please keep up with the discussion.

I don't suppose you are ever going to answer the question, are you? So you believe that piracy will ultimately make the creation of new films untenable. Okay.

Originally Posted by Xei

No you dolt, you used one which meant something completely different. Steam is not the same thing as the stuff you purchase via Steam, unless you're doing it very wrong.

I chose the wrong word without thinking. My point still stand though, even with products.
Obviously the product has to be better not just the service, and you're fucking arguing about a better product with this cinema quality bullshit.

Originally Posted by Xei

Lord of the Rings Extended Edition Boxset... check.
Blade Runner Final Cut... check.
Harry Potter DVD with extras... check.
Okay, I'm bored of this now. I ask you to exercise self-criticality and you apparently don't even bother to Google for the thing you just told me to Google.

Did you download them and check?
I've personally never seen any special editions.
They may be there for the really popular ones, people usually don't bother for the average movie afaict.

Originally Posted by Xei

What companies? Film companies exist right now because cinemas are superior to monitors and downloading can be slow, fussy, and lower quality. I've already said all this, please keep up with the discussion.

I don't suppose you are ever going to answer the question, are you? So you believe that piracy will ultimately make the creation of new films untenable. Okay.

Your question is stupid, I've already said.
You're just automatically assuming that people will not buy the movies if you can download in good quality (even though you can already download blu-ray versions). Based on nothing. Everything so far says they will keep buying them, and downloading them for free. But not at a loss to the copyright holders. Your question is invalid.

Like I said before, most of my friends that used to pirate movies now only pirate movies which they can't find on netflix, or pirate movies if they don't have netflix. Most of my friends which pirate games also buy all the games they can afford to, same with music. Piracy does not stop sales, it increases them by allowing products to be more widespread. The only thing limiting people from purchasing everything is their finances. They don't pirate because they can and ynot fux the companies lulz. They pirate in order to try before buying.

Originally Posted by tommo

....Right.... just ignore all our points and call our pro-piracy attitude "baseless".
Nice tactic.

I've yet to hear a solid argument in defense of it, and have been unable to determine one myself, therefore until that changes it will tend to appear that way.

Originally Posted by Omnis Dei

Like I said before, most of my friends that used to pirate movies now only pirate movies which they can't find on netflix, or pirate movies if they don't have netflix. Most of my friends which pirate games also buy all the games they can afford to, same with music. Piracy does not stop sales, it increases them by allowing products to be more widespread. The only thing limiting people from purchasing everything is their finances. They don't pirate because they can and ynot fux the companies lulz. They pirate in order to try before buying.

Most people don't have this same sense of morals. I don't think this "try before buying" attitude is so bad. It's just that it's uncommon to find someone that only does this, even amongst those who say they do.

My point, though, was that, in light of SOPA and PIPA, piracy makes a great excuse for lawmakers to push shoddy legislation that threatens the right of people engaged in legitimate activities.

But that point's been made. I'd like to hear the core argument in favor of piracy.

Originally Posted by Xei

Piracy isn't a fundamentally new technology, and in no sane sense at all does it 'replace' the film industry; it's just getting better and far easier. You've so far failed to answer the central question: how can films possibly even be made when the new 'technology' takes those films and gives them out virtually for free?

You've failed to understand my point (although neither have some pro-piracy people either): as technology improves, some industries grow and some die. Why would the survival of the established film industry be more important than freedom to copy information? The world, it's a changin'.

Originally Posted by Supernova

But that point's been made. I'd like to hear the core argument in favor of piracy.

The other posters might give arguments, with varying degrees of philosophical relevance. But before I answer, let's try an exercise. Assuming you believe in free speech, what's your core argument for it (free speech)?

Originally Posted by Supernova

Most people don't have this same sense of morals. I don't think this "try before buying" attitude is so bad. It's just that it's uncommon to find someone that only does this, even amongst those who say they do.

My point, though, was that, in light of SOPA and PIPA, piracy makes a great excuse for lawmakers to push shoddy legislation that threatens the right of people engaged in legitimate activities.

But that point's been made. I'd like to hear the core argument in favor of piracy.

This is speculation. While my experience is anecdotal, my experience is that people resort to piracy because of the unfair conditions they have been presented with. It has nothing to do with people taking advantage of new technology. People used to copy VHS tapes and sell them right on the street.

It comes down to our consumerist cultures flooding the market with products mislabeled as art, while people with minimal purchasing power are still looking to find the art. So they go through the crap for free while still spending their extra money on the art.

Kids are the only exception, but I don't know a single adult who chooses piracy over purchase just because they can, and not because of the reasons I stated above.

The only way to prove people are taking advantage just because they can is to show me how the industries are going bankrupt. They are not. They are doing just fine.