• Lucid Dreaming - Dream Views




    Results 1 to 21 of 21
    Like Tree5Likes
    • 2 Post By Marvo
    • 1 Post By Photolysis
    • 1 Post By tommo
    • 1 Post By greenhavoc

    Thread: Wikileaks reveals “TrapWire,” a government spy network that uses ordinary surveillance cameras

    1. #1
      LD's this year: ~7 tommo's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jan 2007
      Gender
      Location
      Melbourne
      Posts
      9,202
      Likes
      4986
      DJ Entries
      7

      Wikileaks reveals “TrapWire,” a government spy network that uses ordinary surveillance cameras

      Wikileaks reveals "TrapWire," a government spy network that uses ordinary surveillance cameras

      It's just like an episode of Person of Interest. According to documents leaked on Wikileaks, the government has created a piece of technology, called TrapWire, that siphons data from surveillance cameras in stores, casinos, and other businesses around the country. Apparently agents can use facial recognition software to analyze this footage for, well, people of interest. Are we living in a total surveillance state without even realizing it? Over at Business Insider, David Seaman reports on the contents of the documents at Wikileaks:
      Every few seconds, data picked up at surveillance points in major cities and landmarks across the United States are recorded digitally on the spot, then encrypted and instantaneously delivered to a fortified central database center at an undisclosed location to be aggregated with other intelligence. It's part of a program called TrapWire and it's the brainchild of the Abraxas, a Northern Virginia company staffed with elite from America's intelligence community.
      The employee roster at Arbaxas reads like a who's who of agents once with the Pentagon, CIA and other government entities according to their public LinkedIn profiles, and the corporation's ties are assumed to go deeper than even documented. The details on Abraxas and, to an even greater extent TrapWire, are scarce, however, and not without reason. For a program touted as a tool to thwart terrorism and monitor activity meant to be under wraps, its understandable that Abraxas would want the program's public presence to be relatively limited. But thanks to last year's hack of the Strategic Forecasting intelligence agency, or Stratfor, all of that is quickly changing."
      So: those spooky new "circular" dark globe cameras installed in your neighborhood park, town, or city-they aren't just passively monitoring. They're plugged into Trapwire and they are potentially monitoring every single person via facial recognition.
      Currently it's pretty hard to reach Wikileaks to read the papers yourself, because the site has been crushed under an onslaught of DDOS attacks — which, how convenient is that, conspiracy theorists? But you can still see a description of Abraxas' Tripwire technology here, at the USPTO.

    2. #2
      Xei
      UnitedKingdom Xei is offline
      Banned
      Join Date
      Aug 2005
      Posts
      9,984
      Likes
      3084
      I always find it hard to determine this kind of thing as obviously good or bad in itself. People bandy about the word 'Orwellian' but it isn't really. It's not invasion into your thoughts, it's not invasion into your private space, and even if it were it can only be used to prosecute violations of whatever the law is.

      What can this technology (as stated) do? It can alert the government to the location of wanted individuals... that doesn't seem like a very bad thing. Basically it's the same as teaching all those shop owners the faces on the most wanted list, except cheaper, more reliable, and less prone to leaks; and that idea doesn't seem very disturbing.

      A similar question; what about when neuroscientists develop an infallible method for determining whether somebody is telling the truth? Trials would become pretty much redundant. Correct charges would always lead to imprisonment and there wouldn't be any mistaken punishments... again, seems on the whole like a good thing to me, as long as the legal system is just; the only reason to be worried about it is if you plan on committing a crime.
      Last edited by Xei; 08-13-2012 at 02:55 PM.

    3. #3
      ├┼┼┼┼┤
      Join Date
      Jun 2006
      Gender
      Location
      Equestria
      Posts
      6,315
      Likes
      1191
      DJ Entries
      1
      The problem is that the legal system isn't just. In the US there are plenty of laws that allow the police to arrest pretty much any person, any where at any time.

      ---------
      Lost count of how many lucid dreams I've had
      ---------

    4. #4
      Xei
      UnitedKingdom Xei is offline
      Banned
      Join Date
      Aug 2005
      Posts
      9,984
      Likes
      3084
      Yeah I don't disagree.

    5. #5
      LD's this year: ~7 tommo's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jan 2007
      Gender
      Location
      Melbourne
      Posts
      9,202
      Likes
      4986
      DJ Entries
      7
      Of course, in itself it is fantastic. Combined with a power hungry clan, not so great. Especially when they have massive spy centers that accumulate and sort GPS data etc.

    6. #6
      Member Photolysis's Avatar
      Join Date
      Dec 2007
      Gender
      Posts
      1,270
      Likes
      316
      Quote Originally Posted by Xei View Post
      A similar question; what about when neuroscientists develop an infallible method for determining whether somebody is telling the truth? Trials would become pretty much redundant. Correct charges would always lead to imprisonment and there wouldn't be any mistaken punishments... again, seems on the whole like a good thing to me, as long as the legal system is just; the only reason to be worried about it is if you plan on committing a crime.
      Wouldn't work if a person genuinely believed they didn't do something or they had no recollection. Trials would still be needed to provide independent evidence.

      Another good way to defeat it would be to arbitrarily redefine words in response to a question. If I decide to redefine "murder" to "offer a polite greeting" then I could easily answer the question "Did you murder Mr. Smith" with a legitimate "No", without lying. Even if a specific meaning is given for a term I can still redefine any word within that definition.
      tommo likes this.

    7. #7
      Wololo Achievements:
      Created Dream Journal Tagger Second Class 1000 Hall Points Made lots of Friends on DV Populated Wall Referrer Bronze Veteran First Class
      Supernova's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jul 2009
      LD Count
      Gender
      Location
      Spiral out, keep going.
      Posts
      2,909
      Likes
      908
      DJ Entries
      10
      Hm. The most recent post on Wikileaks' front page is the Syria Files, from July.

      EDIT: ah, this is part of the global intelligence files?

    8. #8
      LD's this year: ~7 tommo's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jan 2007
      Gender
      Location
      Melbourne
      Posts
      9,202
      Likes
      4986
      DJ Entries
      7
      Yep, that's the one ^

    9. #9
      Wololo Achievements:
      Created Dream Journal Tagger Second Class 1000 Hall Points Made lots of Friends on DV Populated Wall Referrer Bronze Veteran First Class
      Supernova's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jul 2009
      LD Count
      Gender
      Location
      Spiral out, keep going.
      Posts
      2,909
      Likes
      908
      DJ Entries
      10
      Quote Originally Posted by tommo View Post
      Yep, that's the one ^
      Oh.

      I have an 8 hour car ride coming up. I'll have a look around and let you know what I think. I don't know if any of you guys grabbed that torrent, but it's worth a look see. It's actually really interesting to read through some of those emails, when you realize what you're looking at. One of the few I read all the way through contained some interesting discussion about the Czech Republic and Russia.
      Last edited by Supernova; 08-18-2012 at 03:18 PM.

    10. #10
      "O" will suffice. Achievements:
      1 year registered Made lots of Friends on DV Referrer Gold Veteran First Class Populated Wall Tagger First Class 25000 Hall Points Vivid Dream Journal
      Oneironaut Zero's Avatar
      Join Date
      Apr 2005
      LD Count
      20+ Years Worth
      Gender
      Location
      Central Florida
      Posts
      16,083
      Likes
      4031
      DJ Entries
      149
      I have to start threads on these issues faster. Everyone keeps beating me to them. Lol.
      http://i.imgur.com/Ke7qCcF.jpg
      (Or see the very best of my journal entries @ dreamwalkerchronicles.blogspot)

    11. #11
      LD's this year: ~7 tommo's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jan 2007
      Gender
      Location
      Melbourne
      Posts
      9,202
      Likes
      4986
      DJ Entries
      7
      It's probably a problem with the long title of this thread, but this is the only one that I get in e-mail updates that when I click the thread link it doesn't open the browser.

      Creepy coincidence?

      And sorry O'
      Oneironaut Zero likes this.

    12. #12
      Rational Spiritualist DrunkenArse's Avatar
      Join Date
      May 2009
      Gender
      Location
      Da Aina
      Posts
      2,941
      Likes
      1092
      Quote Originally Posted by Photolysis View Post
      Another good way to defeat it would be to arbitrarily redefine words in response to a question. If I decide to redefine "murder" to "offer a polite greeting" then I could easily answer the question "Did you murder Mr. Smith" with a legitimate "No", without lying. Even if a specific meaning is given for a term I can still redefine any word within that definition.
      That seems like lying to me. I also question your ability to actually pull this off.
      Previously PhilosopherStoned

    13. #13
      Xei
      UnitedKingdom Xei is offline
      Banned
      Join Date
      Aug 2005
      Posts
      9,984
      Likes
      3084
      Quote Originally Posted by Photolysis View Post
      Wouldn't work if a person genuinely believed they didn't do something or they had no recollection. Trials would still be needed to provide independent evidence.
      Well, sure, but that's an extreme minority of cases.

      Another good way to defeat it would be to arbitrarily redefine words in response to a question. If I decide to redefine "murder" to "offer a polite greeting" then I could easily answer the question "Did you murder Mr. Smith" with a legitimate "No", without lying. Even if a specific meaning is given for a term I can still redefine any word within that definition.
      It's a hypothetical method... nitpicking like this isn't really the point. I define the method such that it can't be tricked like this.

    14. #14
      Rational Spiritualist DrunkenArse's Avatar
      Join Date
      May 2009
      Gender
      Location
      Da Aina
      Posts
      2,941
      Likes
      1092
      Since we seem to be developing these technologies that allow for an absolute police state, does that seem to be powerful motivation to get rid of goverments that will clearly abuse the power?
      Previously PhilosopherStoned

    15. #15
      Banned
      Join Date
      Sep 2010
      Gender
      Location
      Texas
      Posts
      1,362
      Likes
      614
      Huxley > Orwell
      Oneironaut Zero likes this.

    16. #16
      "O" will suffice. Achievements:
      1 year registered Made lots of Friends on DV Referrer Gold Veteran First Class Populated Wall Tagger First Class 25000 Hall Points Vivid Dream Journal
      Oneironaut Zero's Avatar
      Join Date
      Apr 2005
      LD Count
      20+ Years Worth
      Gender
      Location
      Central Florida
      Posts
      16,083
      Likes
      4031
      DJ Entries
      149
      Quote Originally Posted by greenhavoc View Post
      Huxley > Orwell
      I think it's absolutely the point, that: more people associating "police state" with Orwell makes it so hard for people to understand/fathom that we really are heading toward a [Huxlean?] police state.
      Last edited by Oneironaut Zero; 08-31-2012 at 04:35 AM.
      http://i.imgur.com/Ke7qCcF.jpg
      (Or see the very best of my journal entries @ dreamwalkerchronicles.blogspot)

    17. #17
      Banned
      Join Date
      Sep 2010
      Gender
      Location
      Texas
      Posts
      1,362
      Likes
      614
      Quote Originally Posted by Oneironaut Zero View Post
      I think it's absolutely the point, that: more people associating "police state" with Orwell makes it so hard for people to understand/fathom that we really are heading toward a [Huxlean?] police state.
      Paranoia as a means of lethargy, if I didn't know it was of human design I'd start talking nonsense; angels and demons. It's right in front of us all, lol.

    18. #18
      Xei
      UnitedKingdom Xei is offline
      Banned
      Join Date
      Aug 2005
      Posts
      9,984
      Likes
      3084
      Quote Originally Posted by Oneironaut Zero View Post
      I think it's absolutely the point, that: more people associating "police state" with Orwell makes it so hard for people to understand/fathom that we really are heading toward a [Huxlean?] police state.
      There wasn't any police state in Huxley. ._.

      Video surveillance = Orwellian.

    19. #19
      LD's this year: ~7 tommo's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jan 2007
      Gender
      Location
      Melbourne
      Posts
      9,202
      Likes
      4986
      DJ Entries
      7
      Yeah, was gonna say the same thing. Huxley never wrote about a police state as far as I know.

      Personally, and I think I've said this before, I think we will have a hybrid of the two. Actually, I think we already do have a hybrid of the two. But it will get worse.
      Reality TV shows and celebrity gossip are taking care of Huxley's warning, while government spy agencies and some multinational corporations are using 1984 as a guidebook.

    20. #20
      Member Achievements:
      Created Dream Journal Made lots of Friends on DV Referrer Bronze Populated Wall Tagger First Class 25000 Hall Points Veteran First Class
      <s><span class='glow_9ACD32'>DeletePlease</span></s>'s Avatar
      Join Date
      Nov 2010
      Posts
      2,685
      Likes
      2883
      DJ Entries
      12
      Quote Originally Posted by tommo View Post
      Yeah, was gonna say the same thing. Huxley never wrote about a police state as far as I know.

      Personally, and I think I've said this before, I think we will have a hybrid of the two. Actually, I think we already do have a hybrid of the two. But it will get worse.
      Two parts Huxley, one part Orwell imo. We've devolved into a culture of complacency that isn't quite as numb to it all as Huxley's vision, but just enough so that Orwellian tactics can start being applied without a reaction from the masses.

      i so scurrd :[
      Last edited by GavinGill; 09-09-2012 at 11:15 PM.

    21. #21
      "O" will suffice. Achievements:
      1 year registered Made lots of Friends on DV Referrer Gold Veteran First Class Populated Wall Tagger First Class 25000 Hall Points Vivid Dream Journal
      Oneironaut Zero's Avatar
      Join Date
      Apr 2005
      LD Count
      20+ Years Worth
      Gender
      Location
      Central Florida
      Posts
      16,083
      Likes
      4031
      DJ Entries
      149
      Quote Originally Posted by Xei View Post
      There wasn't any police state in Huxley. ._.

      Video surveillance = Orwellian.
      Excuse me, I should have use quotation marks when I said "police state".

      I am speaking about the covert level of control over the population that was displayed in Huxley's book - not the in-your-face, boot-stamping type in 1984. What went on in Brave New World was very much a level of control, brought about by conditioning. It was a system that 'policed itself', through indoctrination. I'm not talking about video surveillance, in this case. I'm talking about the subconscious and manipulative methods of control exerted over a population. Don't forget about what happened in Brave New World, when you 'went off your programming' and started thinking adversely to the system; you were exiled. That is very much a 'police state', and the relation between the two is what Huxley wrote to Orwell about in his letter. They both had visions of the way the government would control and manipulate their people. It is just that they had different visions. What Huxley envisioned was more a 'passively coerced' 'police state' than Orwell's, but they were two sides of the same coin.
      http://i.imgur.com/Ke7qCcF.jpg
      (Or see the very best of my journal entries @ dreamwalkerchronicles.blogspot)

    Similar Threads

    1. Replies: 16
      Last Post: 10-15-2011, 05:48 PM
    2. Replies: 31
      Last Post: 03-19-2008, 04:12 AM

    Bookmarks

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •